2016
DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2016.1219721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status demotion in hierarchical loyalty programs: effects of payment source

Abstract: Hierarchical loyalty programs are being operated currently by many firms to improve customer relationships. While past work has demonstrated the negative effects of status demotion in such programs, research on how these effects may vary across different customer group based on payment source is almost nonexistent. This paper examines the moderating role of payment source ('own money' versus 'others money') on the effects of status demotion on customer attitudes and behavior in hierarchical loyalty programs. A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(94 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of our study contribute to the loyalty program research and relationship marketing literature by confirming and extending past research, which found customer status demotion has a negative impact on customers’ attitudes and loyalty (Wagner et al , 2009; van Berlo et al , 2014; Gao and Zhang, 2015; Ramaseshan et al , 2016). To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study to: examine the negative effect of demotion on perceived betrayal; and differentiate the effect of demotion between high-status and low-status customers. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The findings of our study contribute to the loyalty program research and relationship marketing literature by confirming and extending past research, which found customer status demotion has a negative impact on customers’ attitudes and loyalty (Wagner et al , 2009; van Berlo et al , 2014; Gao and Zhang, 2015; Ramaseshan et al , 2016). To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study to: examine the negative effect of demotion on perceived betrayal; and differentiate the effect of demotion between high-status and low-status customers. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We propose that the status level of customers may moderate these relationships. This is likely, as a recent study by Ramaseshan et al (2016) found that the effect of satisfaction and commitment on loyalty intention was weaker for customers who spend their own money to obtain their loyalty status compared to customers who were funded by others, e.g. employer.…”
Section: Status Level and Perceived Betrayalmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Research on status demotion has grown since Wagner, Hennig-Thurau, and Rudolph’s (2009) seminal work. Recent research has examined various factors such as program involvement (e.g., Hwang and Kwon 2016; Mathies and Gudergan 2012; Shin and Park 2014), magnitude of demotion (e.g., Mutter and Kundisch 2014), cause of demotion (e.g., Hwang and Kwon 2016; Lepthien et al 2017; van Berlo, Bloemer, and Blazevic 2014; Wagner, Hennig-Thurau, and Rudolph 2009), payment source (e.g., Ramaseshan, Stein, and Rabbanee 2016), monetary compensation (e.g., Lepthien et al 2017; Wagner, Hennig-Thurau, and Rudolph 2009), and pre-demotion tier level (e.g., Ramaseshan and Ouschan 2017; Shin and Park 2014; Wang et al 2016).…”
Section: Review Of Literature For Studymentioning
confidence: 99%