Status and Trends in Global Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital: Assessing Progress Toward Aichi Biodiversity Target 14

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity uses six indicators to assess progress toward Aichi Biodiversity Target 14 (ecosystem services), leaving many elements of the target untracked. We identify 13 ecosystem services as directly essential for human well-being, and select a set of 21 datasets as indicators of the state of natural capital underpinning those services, the benefits derived from them, and distribution of access to those benefits. Analysis of these indicators supports previous conclusions that there is no overall progress toward Target 14. Sixty percent of our "benefit" indicators have positive trends, whereas 86% of our "state" indicators show a decline in natural capital. This suggests that well-being is increasing in the near-term despite environmental degradation, and that unsustainable use of natural capital may fuel human development. As regulating services such as "soil fertility" continue to decline, however, it seems unlikely that this trend can continue without future negative impacts on humanity.

Global marine biodiversity in the context of achieving the Aichi Targets: ways forward and addressing data gaps

“…Each ‘Aichi Target’ was designed to better understand and predict biodiversity dynamics, such as how biological diversity underpins ecosystem function, and how the provision of ecosystem services is essential for human well-being. Meeting the Aichi Targets would ultimately benefit local livelihoods and economic development, and is essential for biodiversity maintenance and poverty reduction (Shepherd et al, 2016; Tittensor et al, 2010). In this paper, we report on the findings of a working group that discussed how the targets related to marine biodiversity were being achieved.…”

Global Biodiversity Targets Require Both Sufficiency and Efficiency

“…However, the set of indicators used for target monitoring is sometimes inadequate, hindering the ability to accurately monitor some of the targets (Shepherd et al . ). More alarmingly, there is evidence that different indicators can lead to contrasting assessments.…”

“…An important part of an efficient global plan for biodiversity conservation is the establishment of an efficient framework for monitoring progress toward targets. However, the set of indicators used for target monitoring is sometimes inadequate, hindering the ability to accurately monitor some of the targets (Shepherd et al 2016). More alarmingly, there is evidence that different indicators can lead to contrasting assessments.…”

Today's protected areas: supporting a more sustainable future for humanity

“…In short, the status of most of the planet's ecosystems is declining (Shepherd et al 2016;IPBES 2019) and species continue to be lost at a pace 1000 times the background rate (De Vos et al 2015). The growing problems posed by habitat change, overexploitation of natural resources, habitat fragmentation, spread of invasive alien species, and changing climate have shown that more effective approaches to sustainable resource management are required.…”