Status and Trends in Demography of Northern Spotted Owls, 1985–2003

Abstract

We analyzed demographic data from northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina) from 14 study areas in Washington, Oregon, and California for 1985-2003. The purpose of our analyses was to provide an assessment of the status and trends of northern spotted owl populations throughout most of their geographic range. The 14 study areas made up approximately 12% of the range of the subspecies and included federal, tribal, private, and mixed federal and private lands. The study areas also included all the major forest types that the subspecies inhabits. The analyses followed rigorous protocols that were developed a priori and were the result of extensive discussions and consensus among the authors. Our primary objectives were to estimate fecundity, apparent survival (/), and annual rate of population change (k) and to determine if there were any temporal trends in these population parameters. In addition to analyses of data from individual study areas, we conducted 2 meta-analyses on each demographic parameter. One meta-analysis was conducted on all 14 areas, and the other was restricted to the 8 areas that constituted the Effectiveness Monitoring Plan for northern spotted owls under the Northwest Forest Plan. The average number of years of reproductive data per study area was 14 (range ¼ 5-19), and the average number of recapture occasions per study area was 13 (range ¼ 4-18). Only 1 study area had ,12 years of data. Our results were based on 32,054 captures and resightings of 11,432 banded individuals for estimation of survival and 10,902 instances in which we documented the number of young produced by territorial females.The number of young fledged (NYF) per territorial female was analyzed by testing a suite of a priori models that included (1) effects of age, (2) linear or quadratic time trends, (3) presence of barred owls (Strix varia) in spotted owl territories, and (4) an even-odd year effect. The NYF varied among years on most study areas with a biennial cycle of high reproduction in even-numbered years and low reproduction in odd-numbered years. These cyclic fluctuations did not occur on all study areas, and the even-odd year effect waned during the last 5 years of the study. Fecundity was highest for adults (x¼0.372, SE¼0.029), lower for 2-year-olds (x¼0.208, SE¼0.032), and very low for 1-year-olds (x¼0.074, SE¼ 0.029). Fecundity was stable over time for 6 areas (Rainier, Olympic, Warm Springs, H. J. Andrews, Klamath, and Marin), declining for 6 areas (Wenatchee, Cle Elum, Oregon Coast Range, Southern Oregon Cascades, Northwest California, and Simpson), and slightly increasing for 2 areas (Tyee, Hoopa). We found little association between NYF and the proportion of northern spotted owl territories where barred owls were detected, although results were suggestive of a negative effect of barred owls on the Wenatchee and Olympic study areas. The meta-analysis on fecundity indicated substantial annual variability with no increasing or decreasing trends. Fecundity was highest in the mixed-conifer region of eas...

Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) select habitat based on avian predators, landscape composition, and anthropogenic features

“…We also evaluated covariate effects based on regression coefficients (β) and their associated 90% confidence intervals for overlap of 0 as a measure of the strength of evidence for variable effects (Anthony et al 2006, Forsman et al 2011. We considered covariates from competitive models with  10% of CI overlapping 0 ('slightly' overlapping) to have less evidence of effect compared with covariates with no interval overlap of 0, and covariates with  10% of confidence limits above or below 0 to be 'widely' overlapping and to have no support for importance of effect (Dugger et al 2016).…”

Sunning themselves in heaps, knots, and snarls: The extraordinary abundance and demography of island watersnakes

“…We used our top‐ranked CJS model, ϕ (sex*site) p (site*time+sex) (cf. Cam, 2012; Anthony et al., 2006; Seamans & Gutierrez, 2007; Mullin, Colwell, McAllister, & Dinsmore, 2010; Korfanta, Newmark, & Kauffman, 2012), and then considered additive and interactive effects of site, sex, and time on λ (Supporting Information Table S2). Because sampling was initiated in different years among sites, candidate Pradel models all included λ (site) in their parameterization to avoid the effects of a changing study area (Cooch & White, 2017; Pradel, 1996).…”

Management on the basis of the best scientific data or integration of ecological research within management? Lessons learned from the Northern spotted owl saga on the connection between research and management in conservation biology

“…In the case of the NSO, these processes included the creation of numerous scientific ad-hoc groups (cf. Lesson 2), the meta-analyses of the demographic studies performed on the NSO (Anderson and Burnham 1992;Burnham et al 1996;Franklin et al 1999;Anthony et al 2006) and the organization of scientific reviews of some of the documents (e.g. http://www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/pdf/Contract.pdf).…”

“…Some of the recent core NSO documents (Anthony et al 2006) did not consider the new habitat results mentioned in Lesson 3 (Franklin et al 2000;Olson et al 2004;Dugger et al 2005).…”

“…to globally analyze the impact of habitat quantity and quality on demographic rates (Courtney and Franklin 2004;Boyce et al 2005) or to distinguish in non-owl habitat between mature hardwood forests, young successional forests following timber harvesting and those following a natural disturbance (Franklin et al 2000). This lack of data resulted in a series of four meta-analyses that studied the demography of the NSO, but not its relationship with habitat quality (Anderson and Burnham 1992;Burnham et al 1996;Franklin et al 1999;Anthony et al 2006). …”