2014
DOI: 10.9790/0853-13516570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stature Estimation Using Per-Cutaneous Tibial Length in People of Gwalior Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study we have found that the mean PCTL of right side in male is 37.82 and in female is 34.84 whereas the mean PCTL of left side in male is 37.79 and in female is 34.79 and we have found that male has more PCTL length as comparison to female. Similar result was found by Kaore et al [12] and Trivedi et al [14] Our study also correlates with the study conducted by Saini et. al [15] in which the PCTL of male was found to be 40.90 cm and that of the female was 38.09 cm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In our study we have found that the mean PCTL of right side in male is 37.82 and in female is 34.84 whereas the mean PCTL of left side in male is 37.79 and in female is 34.79 and we have found that male has more PCTL length as comparison to female. Similar result was found by Kaore et al [12] and Trivedi et al [14] Our study also correlates with the study conducted by Saini et. al [15] in which the PCTL of male was found to be 40.90 cm and that of the female was 38.09 cm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The correlation coefficient (R) between height and tibial length in females were also 0.259 and 0.258 for the right and left tibial lengths respectively. This finding is supported by a study conducted on 540 students (270 males and 270 females) in the age group 18 to 21 years in Madhya Pradesh (Trivedi et al 2014). In this study, it was also reported that the correlation coefficients (R) between the height and tibial lengths in males were 0.417 and 0.442 for the right and left tibial lengths respectively and in females were 0.570 and 0.604 for right and left tibial lengths respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…34 Measurements of the tibia and fibula may offer alternatives that are worth investigating in the critical care setting. 30,31,35 Limitations of the study All efforts were made to limit inaccuracy and inconsistency in the anthropometric measurements in the study, by ensuring that the data collectors were well trained and practised in the anthropometric techniques, and by using validated, standardised techniques and high-quality, calibrated equipment. Slight diurnal variation between patients who remained in bed, and those who walked around after waking, may however, have been a source of bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%