The replication crisis—a failure to replicate foundational studies—has sparked a conversation in psychology, HCI, and beyond about scientific reliability. To address the crisis, researchers increasingly adopt preregistration: the practice of documenting research plans before conducting a study. Done properly, preregistration reduces bias from taking exploratory findings as confirmatory. It is crucial to treat preregistration, often an online form/template, as a user-centered design problem to ensure preregistration achieves its intended goal. To understand preregistration in practice, we conducted 14 semi-structured interviews with preregistration users (researchers) who ranged in seniority and experience. We found that norms for using preregistration are uncertain, and identified four purposes people have for using preregistration. We describe how the different purposes could explain conflicting designs of existing preregistration templates, and how they may even undermine the original purpose of preregistration. We suggest opportunities to explicitly resolve these conflicts to support the different purposes of preregistration.