2011
DOI: 10.1177/1745691611400206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Trends in Women’s Participation in Science: Commentary on Valla and Ceci (2011)

Abstract: Valla and Ceci (2011, this issue) describe the participation of women in science and claim that the increases in quantitative fields (e.g., mathematics, engineering, and physical sciences) are an exception to the statement that ''Women's growth in the scientific workforce has been meteoric over the past 40 years'' (p. 134). We disagree and present statistics demonstrating a more positive view of the increase of the number of women in quantitative fields.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there has been some improvement in recent years, women and people of color remain underrepresented in the STEM industry for a variety of reasons that include discrimination, cultural or societal norms, and access to resources (Kessel & Nelson, ). We know that mentorship and support from peers influence a student's decision to remain in STEM (Hrabowski, ); however, students of color have shared that they were given less opportunity to engage in research activities (Hurtado et al, ) or were encouraged to leave their STEM major (Fries‐Britt, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there has been some improvement in recent years, women and people of color remain underrepresented in the STEM industry for a variety of reasons that include discrimination, cultural or societal norms, and access to resources (Kessel & Nelson, ). We know that mentorship and support from peers influence a student's decision to remain in STEM (Hrabowski, ); however, students of color have shared that they were given less opportunity to engage in research activities (Hurtado et al, ) or were encouraged to leave their STEM major (Fries‐Britt, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women and people of color have been largely underrepresented in, and historically excluded from, most STEM fields, though trends are showing improvement (Kessel and Nelson, 2011; National Science Foundation and National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, 2017). Reasons suggested for both race and gender underrepresentation span a range of factors including cultural norms, organizational structures, differential access to appropriate secondary school preparation, discrimination and harassment, and characteristics of individuals themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Carol Dweck (interview with the American Association of University Women [AAUW], 2010, p. 30) American women are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and math ("STEM" fields; AAUW, 2010). Certainly, progress has been made for women's representation in these fields (Kessel & Nelson, 2011) but the data are clear that from high school, to college, to graduate school and beyond the pipeline is "leaking" women all along the way (Alper, 1993;Halpern et al, 2007). Recent research has emphasized the importance of feeling a sense of belonging within a field as a predictor of success and retention (Dasgupta, 2011;Freeman, Anderman, & Jensen, 2007;Good, Rattan, & Dweck, 2012;Inzlicht & Good, 2006;Walton & Cohen, 2011), and thus it is important to understand factors that may specifically influence women's feelings of belonging and motivation for STEM fields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%