2008
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2007.909241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Threat Assessment for General Road Scenes Using Monte Carlo Sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…• Methods that fuse dynamic motion models with behavior and environment descriptions [5,45,75,82,88,144,211,236].…”
Section: Long-term Trajectory Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Methods that fuse dynamic motion models with behavior and environment descriptions [5,45,75,82,88,144,211,236].…”
Section: Long-term Trajectory Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches of [45,75] perform probabilistic trajectory predictions by employing path-planning algorithms from the viewpoint of each traffic participant to generate distributions over future motions of all vehicles. Different combinations of future system inputs are considered via Monte Carlo simulations, in which the stochastic inputs are restricted to specific, typical human driving behaviors and actions such as lane changes or overtaking.…”
Section: Long-term Trajectory Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like [15], this framework is based on the postulate that drivers will not perform maneuvers with high collision risks if safer options are possible. As shown before, the common approach to situation prediction implies independent prediction of each traffic participant.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo sampling is used to find an approximate solution for several trajectories. Further [15] obtains a posterior distribution of the future inputs, assuming that drivers try to avoid collisions. With this posterior distribution, threat assessment can be done.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second step consists in checking these trajectories for intersection points. Numerous algorithms rely on a physical model of vehicles to do that [8], [9], [10], but they are not able to reason on a high-level basis about a situation and therefore are limited to short-term collision prediction. Other approaches estimate the maneuver intention of the drivers to better predict trajectories in the long term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%