2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2012.6232198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment at road intersections: Comparing intention and expectation

Abstract: Abstract-Intersections are the most complex and hazardous areas of the road network, and 89% of accidents at intersection are caused by driver error. We focus on these accidents and propose a novel approach to risk assessment: in this work dangerous situations are identified by detecting conflicts between intention and expectation, i.e. between what drivers intend to do and what is expected of them. Our approach is formulated as a Bayesian inference problem where intention and expectation are estimated jointly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this serves mostly as a way to avoid transient false detections and a separate threshold variable is fit in order to perform classification, while the quality of the estimated probability is not evaluated. Bayesian network models, which give probability estimates of intentions, have been explored by [6], [7] and others. These types of probabilistic models have the potential to explicitly encode domain knowledge but often one needs to include classification type models as local distributions in the network which are similar to the algorithms evaluated in this paper.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this serves mostly as a way to avoid transient false detections and a separate threshold variable is fit in order to perform classification, while the quality of the estimated probability is not evaluated. Bayesian network models, which give probability estimates of intentions, have been explored by [6], [7] and others. These types of probabilistic models have the potential to explicitly encode domain knowledge but often one needs to include classification type models as local distributions in the network which are similar to the algorithms evaluated in this paper.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lefèvre et al [11] pointed out that risk assessment at intersections is possible by comparing intention and expectation. Liebner et al [12] also used drivers' intent inference at intersections.…”
Section: Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (Vanet) Is An Open Mobilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [9] the system needs to estimate the driver intention to stop. With a relaxed driver, the intention not to stop can be detected earlier with individual profiles than with generic profiles.…”
Section: A Gaussian Processes Based Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thresholds are arbitrary set and are not driver dependant. The authors in [9] use speed profiles within a Dynamic Bayesian Network, implemented in cooperative cars for risk assessment at road intersections. The cruise speed of the host vehicle is used for the estimation of the expected deceleration profile, however it is assumed that all driver react in the same manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%