2011
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v041.i01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Software for State Space Methods

Abstract: In this paper we review the state space approach to time series analysis and establish the notation that is adopted in this special volume of the Journal of Statistical Software. We first provide some background on the history of state space methods for the analysis of time series. This is followed by a concise overview of linear Gaussian state space analysis including the modelling framework and appropriate estimation methods. We discuss the important class of unobserved component models which incorporate a t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose that we want to describe the series, on a logarithmic scale, by a state space model containing a quarterly seasonal component and a local linear trend, in the form of an integrated random walk (i.e., in the notation of expression (4) in Commandeur et al (2011), σ 2 ξ = 0). The model, and the MLE of the unknown parameters, can be obtained by dlm as follows.…”
Section: Structural Time Series and Model Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose that we want to describe the series, on a logarithmic scale, by a state space model containing a quarterly seasonal component and a local linear trend, in the form of an integrated random walk (i.e., in the notation of expression (4) in Commandeur et al (2011), σ 2 ξ = 0). The model, and the MLE of the unknown parameters, can be obtained by dlm as follows.…”
Section: Structural Time Series and Model Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We require the φ j (B) to have all their zeros outside the unit circle, and the θ j (B) to have all their zeros on or outside the unit circle. Common versions of the ∆ j (B) would be (i ) the identity operator (∆ j (B) = 1), corresponding to stationary components (such as the observation disturbance t in Equation 1 of Commandeur et al 2011); (ii ) a nonseasonal (1 − B) or seasonal (1 − B s ) difference, or a product of these; or (iii) a seasonal summation operator, 1 + B + · · · + B s−1 (see Equation 5 in Commandeur et al 2011 or equation (7) in the model of Section 5 below). The ∆ j (B) typically have all their zeros on the unit circle, and usually must have no common zeros, as common zeros can create problems for signal extraction results (Bell 1984(Bell , 1991Kohn and Ansley 1987).…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Regcomponent Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model (1) extends the pure ARIMA components model given as Equation 18 of Commandeur et al (2011) in two ways. The first extension involves the regression mean function x t β (also mentioned in Section 2.2 of Commandeur et al 2011).…”
Section: User Definedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once the parameters have been estimated, filtered values of the unobserved components can be extracted by means of the Kalman smoother or its Wiener-Kolmogorov counterpart. These estimation and filtering issues are well understood (see Harvey 1989;Durbin and Koopman 2012 for textbook treatments), and the same can be said of their efficient numerical implementation (see Commandeur et al 2011 and the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%