In this prospective study, the authors determined intrinsic risk factors for falls and recurrent falls and constructed a risk profile that indicated the relative contribution of each risk factor and also estimated the probabilities of falls and recurrent falls. In 1992, over a 28-week period, falls were recorded among 354 elderly subjects aged 70 years or over who were living in homes or apartments for the elderly in Amsterdam and the vicinity. During the study period, 251 falls were reported by 126 subjects (36%), and recurrent falls (> or =2 falls) were reported by 57 subjects (16%). Associations of falls and recurrent falls with potential risk factors were identified in logistic regression models. Mobility impairment regarding one or more of the tested items (i.e., impairment of balance, leg-extension strength, and gait) was associated with falls (adjusted odds ratio (OR) =2.6) and was strongly associated with recurrent falls (OR = 5.0). Dizziness upon standing was associated with falls (OR = 2.1) and recurrent falls (OR = 2.1). However, several risk factors were associated with recurrent falls only: history of stroke (OR = 3.4), poor mental state (OR = 2.4), and postural hypotension (OR = 2.0). The authors constructed a risk profile for recurrent falls that included the five risk factors mentioned above. Inclusion of all risk factors in the profile implied an 84% probability of recurrent falls over a period of 28 weeks, compared with 3% when no risk factor was present. The probability of recurrent falls ranged only from 11% to 29% when predicted by number of falls occurring in the previous year. Physical activity, use of high-risk medication, and the use of vitamin D3, which was randomly allocated to the participants, were not strongly related to either falls or recurrent falls. In conclusion, a large range of probabilities of falls, especially of recurrent falls, was estimated by the risk profiles, in which mobility impairment was the major risk factor. Recurrent fallers may therefore be especially amenable to prevention based on mobility improvement.
Our results do not show a decrease in the incidence of hip fractures and other peripheral fractures in Dutch elderly persons after vitamin D supplementation.
V ITAMIN D deficiency is common in elderly people because of lesser exposure to sunlight, decreased efficiency of the skin in producing vitamin D, and deficient nutrition (1, 2). It may be an important risk factor for hip fractures, which are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. One yr after a fracture, mobility is restored in less than half of the patients, and about 20% of the patients will have died (3). Although true osteomalacia is rare, a suboptimal vitamin D status impairs the production of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25-(OH),D), which is essential for active intestinal calcium absorption. The ensuing secondary hyperparathyroidism will result in increased bone turnover and predominantly cortical bone loss, thus increasing the risk of fractures (4). Patients with a hip fracture often have lower vitamin D levels than do controls of similar age (5,6). Moreover, positive correlations of vitamin D levels with bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur and vertebrae have been found in elderly groups and among younger women with a poor vitamin D status (7, 8).Vitamin D supplementation of 400 IU daily in elderly people has little or no side effects and improves vitamin D status. In elderly people who are 25-hydroxyvitamin D (250HD)-deficient, supplementation increases serum 1,25-(OH),D levels and intestinal calcium absorption and de-
Emotion-oriented care is more effective with regard to the emotional adaptation in nursing homes of persons with a mild to moderate dementia. For the severely demented elderly we did not find this surplus value. This outcome is of clinical importance for elderly persons with dementia who are cared for in nursing homes. With respect to the nursing assistants it is concluded that emotion-oriented care has a positive influence on stress reactions in some of them.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.