1997
DOI: 10.1029/96jb02946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical relations between the parameters of aftershocks in time, space, and magnitude

Abstract: in which similar correlation patterns are found. We focus our attention on these patterns as a source of interesting contrasts between the two earthquake groups. In particular, the significant dependence of these parameters on the depth appears to be a key to understanding the correlation pattern for interplate aftershocks, while a different interpretation is made for intraplate aftershocks because no significant dependence on depth is observed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
117
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
117
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This signals the impact of large earthquake energies, suggesting the relevance of the upper bound E max (t) in (3). This case is actually observed in real seismicity by [27] who obtained a > µ for some aftershock sequences in Greece, and by [23] who found a > µ for 13 out of 34 aftershock sequences in Japan. This case a > µ also characterizes the seismic activity preceding the 1984 M = 6.8 Nagano Prefecture earthquake [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This signals the impact of large earthquake energies, suggesting the relevance of the upper bound E max (t) in (3). This case is actually observed in real seismicity by [27] who obtained a > µ for some aftershock sequences in Greece, and by [23] who found a > µ for 13 out of 34 aftershock sequences in Japan. This case a > µ also characterizes the seismic activity preceding the 1984 M = 6.8 Nagano Prefecture earthquake [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This is nothing but the quiescence of the background activity relative to the stationary Poisson process. It has been shown that ordinary seismicity and even a single sequence of aftershocks is generally well represented by the ETAS model [e.g., Ogata, 1988;Guo and Ogata, 1997]. Therefore the relative quiescence should be more sensitive than the conventional quiescence in the sense that quiescence can be more clearly seen by using a better model of normal aftershock activity or general seismicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constructed aftershock rates were modeled using the modified Omori law. The parameters of the model were computed using the maximum likelihood estimate (Utsu et al 1995;Guo & Ogata 1997 The Canterbury aftershock sequence can be also modelled by the combination of the three rates reflecting the occurrence of two large earthquakes which generated their own aftershock sequences: rð! m c ; tÞ ¼ 1…”
Section: Aftershock Decay Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%