2017
DOI: 10.13063/2327-9214.1264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Power for Postlicensure Medical Product Safety Data-Mining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We employed propensity score stratification to control for confounding in the conditional and unconditional Poisson TreeScan analyses. The Poisson version of the tree‐based scan statistic has been described in detail previously and is briefly summarized in the supplementary materials 1,39 . The composite null hypothesis is that the observed count of each exposed outcome follows the expected count as generated from a Poisson distribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed propensity score stratification to control for confounding in the conditional and unconditional Poisson TreeScan analyses. The Poisson version of the tree‐based scan statistic has been described in detail previously and is briefly summarized in the supplementary materials 1,39 . The composite null hypothesis is that the observed count of each exposed outcome follows the expected count as generated from a Poisson distribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior simulation work has demonstrated that a conditional Poisson model is generally preferred as it adjusts for large volumes of outcomes related to healthcare utilization practices that are unlikely to be attributable to exposure. 14 For example, infants may be monitored more carefully for all outcomes after birth due to normal healthcare patterns. Prior simulations for the Bernoulli model demonstrated no appreciable difference in power under the two models and the improved confounding control under a 1:1 matched design eliminated the need for further adjustment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,7,[10][11][12] The statistical power of TreeScan has been demonstrated previously; however, the scenarios were based on the general adolescent and adult population. 13,14 Power is dependent on the population sample size, the underlying incidence of the outcomes of interest, the effect size, and the size of the outcome tree; therefore, these previously demonstrated scenarios do not apply to a population of mother-infant pairs. To address this gap, we completed multiple simulation analyses to describe the statistical power of TreeScan in the setting of perinatal medication exposures and infant outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When screening potential multiple outcomes for signal identification, it is critical to control the rate of false positives. TreeScan generates multiplicity‐adjusted p ‐values that accurately reflect the type I error rate in the absence of confounding 10,16,17,20‐23 . That is, if there is not a single outcome with an excess risk, we have a 95% probability of finding zero signals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%