2016
DOI: 10.1515/intag-2015-0076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical modelling of agrometeorological time series by exponential smoothing

Abstract: A b s t r a c t. Meteorological time series are used in modelling agrophysical processes of the soil-plant-atmosphere system which determine plant growth and yield. Additionally, longterm meteorological series are used in climate change scenarios. Such studies often require forecasting or projection of meteorological variables, eg the projection of occurrence of the extreme events. The aim of the article was to determine the most suitable exponential smoothing models to generate forecast using data on air temp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ET is a process which depends on factors such as air temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, wind speed and geographical position of place [2]. Plenty of authors have used different smoothing techniques for forecasting time series [1,[3][4][5][6]. In order to determine the most suitable models to generate forecast Murat et al (2016) compared several exponential smoothing models on the data of air temperature, precipitation and wind speed from Jokioinen (Finland), Dikopshof (Germany), Lleida (Spain) and Lublin (Poland) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ET is a process which depends on factors such as air temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, wind speed and geographical position of place [2]. Plenty of authors have used different smoothing techniques for forecasting time series [1,[3][4][5][6]. In order to determine the most suitable models to generate forecast Murat et al (2016) compared several exponential smoothing models on the data of air temperature, precipitation and wind speed from Jokioinen (Finland), Dikopshof (Germany), Lleida (Spain) and Lublin (Poland) [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RMSE is the square root of the average squared values of the differences between the forecast and the corresponding observation. Those errors have the same units of measurement and depend on the units in which the data are measured [34]. Figures 1 -3 show the validation plots of τMODIS against τAERONET for the study area using both retrievals, including the seasonal validation.…”
Section: Time Series (Ts) Expert Modelermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They all have good coefficient of determination (R 2 is between 0.690 -0.935) while their respective values of standard deviation (SD) is small and fairly constant (SD between 0.130 and 0.145). The deviation from unity of the slope of correlation plot represents systematic biases and are mainly due to aerosol model assumptions, instrument calibration or the choice of the lowest 20-50 percentile of the measurements [15,34]. Table 2 shows the comparison of slope and R 2 values for different sites in the study area for the two satellite sensors and the combined data set.…”
Section: Time Series (Ts) Expert Modelermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long‐term meteorological data (usually longer than 30 years) are often analysed for studies concerning climate change impacts on various aspects of human living conditions (Pirttioja et al ., 2015; Fronzek et al ., 2018; Ruiz‐Ramos et al ., 2018; Rodríguez et al ., 2019). Existing historical observation data show spatio‐temporal irregularities (Vose et al ., 2012; Murat et al ., 2016, 2018; Stott et al ., 2016; Gos et al ., 2020) and were obtained with the use of a variety of instruments and measurement techniques which have been modified over time (Jones and Wigley, 2010). Additionally, inconsistencies in ground‐level meteorological data are present in long time series due to issues with instrument relocations (Brohan et al ., 2006), urbanization (Peterson et al ., 1998), and land‐use changes (Montandon et al ., 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%