1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00261.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Issues in the Study of Temporal Data: Daily Experiences

Abstract: This article reviews statistical issues that arise in temporal data, particularly with respect to daily experience data. Issues related to nonindependence of observations, the nature of data structures, and claims of causality are considered. Through the analysis of data from a single subject, we illustrate concomitant time-series analysis, a general method of examining relationships between two or more series having 50 or more observations. We also discuss detection of and remedies for the problems of trend, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
282
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
282
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the number of observations per person provides adequate degrees of freedom, it becomes possible to specify more rigorous models that enable one to evaluate whether rumination on a given day is associated with avoidance and revenge motivation on the next day, even after controlling for previous levels of avoidance and revenge motivation. Establishing that changes in a putative x variable (e.g., rumination) precede changes in a putative y variable (i.e., forgiveness) would provide stronger (although by no means definitive) support for the proposition that the rumination-forgiveness association is a causal one (Finkel, 1995;West & Hepworth, 1991). Therefore, we conducted a third study using data from a 21-day diary study that allowed us to evaluate the temporal nature of the relations among our variables.…”
Section: Summary Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the number of observations per person provides adequate degrees of freedom, it becomes possible to specify more rigorous models that enable one to evaluate whether rumination on a given day is associated with avoidance and revenge motivation on the next day, even after controlling for previous levels of avoidance and revenge motivation. Establishing that changes in a putative x variable (e.g., rumination) precede changes in a putative y variable (i.e., forgiveness) would provide stronger (although by no means definitive) support for the proposition that the rumination-forgiveness association is a causal one (Finkel, 1995;West & Hepworth, 1991). Therefore, we conducted a third study using data from a 21-day diary study that allowed us to evaluate the temporal nature of the relations among our variables.…”
Section: Summary Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a diary method has some methodological advantages as compared to single-point self-report questionnaires. First, the problem of retrospection is minimized by reducing the time between actual occurrence and report (West & Hepworth, 1991). Second, by examining the temporal precedence of events within individuals, participants can be used as their own controls, thereby reducing the influence of confounding variables (West & Hepworth, 1991).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all analyses, we controlled for day of the week by including four uncentered dummy variables (with Friday as the reference day) to model day of the week (West & Hepworth, 1991). The day variables (time-varying covariates) were included in all the analyses and modeled as fixed effects (no level 2 variance component) (Bryk & Raudenbush, 1992, p. 151).…”
Section: Multilevel Data and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%