2006
DOI: 10.1524/stnd.2006.24.2.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical inference on graphs

Abstract: The problem of graph inference, or graph reconstruction, is to predict the presence or absence of edges between a set of given points known to form the vertices of a graph. Motivated by various applications including communication networks and systems biology, we propose a general model for studying the problem of graph inference in a supervised learning framework. In our setting, both the graph vertices and edges are assumed to be random, with a probability distribution that possibly depends on the size of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now have a look at previous works that are closely related to our work, as shown in Table 1, and present the merits of our method. Biau and Bleakley (2006), Clémenc ¸on, Lugosi, and Vayatis (2008) and Papa, Bellet, and Clémenc ¸on (2016) deal with the case when the graph is complete, i.e., the target value of every pair of vertices is known. In this case, Clémenc ¸on, Lugosi, and Vayatis (2008) formulate the "low-noise" condition for the ranking problem and demonstrate that this condition can lead to tighter risk bounds by the moment inequality for U -processes.…”
Section: Intuitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now have a look at previous works that are closely related to our work, as shown in Table 1, and present the merits of our method. Biau and Bleakley (2006), Clémenc ¸on, Lugosi, and Vayatis (2008) and Papa, Bellet, and Clémenc ¸on (2016) deal with the case when the graph is complete, i.e., the target value of every pair of vertices is known. In this case, Clémenc ¸on, Lugosi, and Vayatis (2008) formulate the "low-noise" condition for the ranking problem and demonstrate that this condition can lead to tighter risk bounds by the moment inequality for U -processes.…”
Section: Intuitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given observations X i , X j about nodes i and j of a network, we aim to understand how these two explanatory variables are related to the probability of connection between the two corresponding vertices, such that P(Y (i,j) = 1) = f (X i , X j ), by estimating f within a high-dimensional class based on logistic regression. Besides this high-dimensional parametric modelling, various fully non-parametric statistical frameworks were exploited in the literature, see, for example, Gao et al (2015); Wolfe and Olhede (2013), for graphon estimation, Biau and Bleakly (2008); Papa et al (2016) for graph reconstruction and Bickel and Chen (2009) for modularity analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by numerous applications, the theory of U -statistics and U -processes has received considerable attention in the past decades. U -statistics appear naturally in ranking (Clémençon et al, 2008), clustering (Clémençon, 2014) and learning on graphs (Biau and Bleakley, 2006) or as components of higher-order terms in expansions of smooth statistics, see, for example, Robins et al (2009). The general setting may be described as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%