Abstract:The lines of a co‐author graph represent channels of communication through which information has been and may continue to be informally exchanged. The Brillouin Information Measure can be used to describe important properties of the co‐author graph and other communication‐graphs. The “connectedness” of a graph can be represented on a scale in which one limiting value signifies a connected graph and the other limiting value signifies a graph in which all points are isolated. Important points can be distinguishe… Show more
“…san, 1975), there is evidence that such analysis is a reasonable way to judge journal influence through use (Garfield, 1972;Smith, 1981;Jensen, Long, Smith, Stulz, & Warner, 1987). Journal cohesiveness can be measured, for example, by determining the effect of each journal upon the amount of communication entropy (disorder) existing in a system of journals publishing articles on the same subject (Shaw, 1981(Shaw, , 1983Pao, 1980;Boyce & Martin, 1981).…”
Section: The Methodology: Citations Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A measure of this mutual citation strength used in bibliometric research relates the effect of each journal to the amount of communication entropy (disorder) existing in a system of journals publishing articles on the same subject (the Brillouin measure: Shaw, 1981Shaw, , 1983Pao, 1980;Boyce & Martin, 1981). In this analysis, the data in Table 3 (Shannon & Weaver, 1963) to measure the amount of communication entropy within a set of journals.…”
Section: Determining the Mis Core Based Upon Cohesionmentioning
Abstract-Due to difficulties with objectively evaluating the quality of MIS research, attitudes about journals in which this research is published play an important role in determining the allocation of research resources. To provide a more objective basis for these attitudes, we examine journal influence in communicating MIS research over a 9-year period using citation analyses, researcher perceptions, and publishing patterns of top MIS research universities. As a result of these analyses, we identify a cohesive stable group of highly influential journals which can reasonably be called an MIS core. An internal ranking of this core is then determined which is significantly different from prior rankings.
“…san, 1975), there is evidence that such analysis is a reasonable way to judge journal influence through use (Garfield, 1972;Smith, 1981;Jensen, Long, Smith, Stulz, & Warner, 1987). Journal cohesiveness can be measured, for example, by determining the effect of each journal upon the amount of communication entropy (disorder) existing in a system of journals publishing articles on the same subject (Shaw, 1981(Shaw, , 1983Pao, 1980;Boyce & Martin, 1981).…”
Section: The Methodology: Citations Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A measure of this mutual citation strength used in bibliometric research relates the effect of each journal to the amount of communication entropy (disorder) existing in a system of journals publishing articles on the same subject (the Brillouin measure: Shaw, 1981Shaw, , 1983Pao, 1980;Boyce & Martin, 1981). In this analysis, the data in Table 3 (Shannon & Weaver, 1963) to measure the amount of communication entropy within a set of journals.…”
Section: Determining the Mis Core Based Upon Cohesionmentioning
Abstract-Due to difficulties with objectively evaluating the quality of MIS research, attitudes about journals in which this research is published play an important role in determining the allocation of research resources. To provide a more objective basis for these attitudes, we examine journal influence in communicating MIS research over a 9-year period using citation analyses, researcher perceptions, and publishing patterns of top MIS research universities. As a result of these analyses, we identify a cohesive stable group of highly influential journals which can reasonably be called an MIS core. An internal ranking of this core is then determined which is significantly different from prior rankings.
“…Extending this research over future periods will tell whether these trends are of an enduring nature or a reflection of the intellectual currents of the last decade. Similarly, additional data analytic procedures like entropy analysis, derived from Shannon and Weaver's (1963) theory of communications, can provide further insights on the extent to which each author contributes to the order or stability of the communications network (e.g., Shaw, 1981Shaw, , 1983. The RR paper represents the beginning of the effort to use bibliometric methods to delineate the intellectual structure of a field.…”
This paper complements a recent study by Ramos-Rodriguez and Ruiz-Navarro (2004) that investigated the intellectual structure of the strategic management field through co-citation analysis. By using authors as the units of analysis and incorporating all the citations that are included in the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index, we trace the evolution of the intellectual structure of the strategic management field during the period 1980-2000. Using a variety of data analytic techniques such as multidimensional scaling, factor analysis, and Pathfinder analysis, we (1) delineate the subfields that constitute the intellectual structure of strategic management; (2) determine the relationships between the subfields; (3) identify authors who play a pivotal role in bridging two or more conceptual domains of research; and (4) graphically map the intellectual structure in two-dimensional space in order to visualize spatial distances between intellectual themes. The analysis provides insights about the influence of individual authors as well as changes in their influence over time.
“…The PFNet is essentially a communication graph that can be analyzed to assess the extent to which each journal contributes to the stability of the network (Cooper et al . ; Shaw, , ; Sullivan et al, ).…”
We elucidate the intellectual progression of the strategic management field by examining knowledge flows to and from the Strategic Management Journal (SMJ) during the period 1980-2009. We provide a detailed mapping of the evolution of the intellectual structure of the field and identify its input-output dependency relationships with other fields. Analysis of citation data using three analytic techniques: log-multiplicative model, pathfinder analysis, and entropy analysis allow us to discern strategic management's influence on and engagement with other disciplines. The results show that, within the intellectual universe of strategic management, SMJ has played a central role, both as a source and storer of knowledge. We notice that, over time, there has been a decline in practitioner orientation, greater communication with finance and sociology, and increasing linkages with international business and entrepreneurship.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.