1953
DOI: 10.1525/9780520347533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Astronomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we also adopt the distance to the young, compact nebula K 3-35 (Tafoya et al 2011), determined using VLBI Exploration of Radio Astrometry (VERA) array observations of a bright water maser in the nebula 2 . Note that the trigonometric method is susceptible to the socalled Lutz-Kelker (L-K) bias (Lutz & Kelker 1973;Smith 2003Smith , 2006Francis 2014) which causes measured parallaxes to be systematically greater than their actual values in a statistical sense, and is broadly related to the Trumpler-Weaver bias (Trumpler & Weaver 1953). As emphasised by van Leeuwen (2007) and Francis (2014), the L-K bias is a sample statistical correction, and has not been applied to individual distances.…”
Section: Trigonometric Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we also adopt the distance to the young, compact nebula K 3-35 (Tafoya et al 2011), determined using VLBI Exploration of Radio Astrometry (VERA) array observations of a bright water maser in the nebula 2 . Note that the trigonometric method is susceptible to the socalled Lutz-Kelker (L-K) bias (Lutz & Kelker 1973;Smith 2003Smith , 2006Francis 2014) which causes measured parallaxes to be systematically greater than their actual values in a statistical sense, and is broadly related to the Trumpler-Weaver bias (Trumpler & Weaver 1953). As emphasised by van Leeuwen (2007) and Francis (2014), the L-K bias is a sample statistical correction, and has not been applied to individual distances.…”
Section: Trigonometric Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer for the first question seems to be quite clear: var M /n seems to be identical to the χ 2 value for M − 1 degree of freedom ( [Trumpler & Weaver 1953]; [Kendall & Stuart 1969]; [Press et al 1992]; the mean is obtained from the sample itself, and therefore the degree of freedom is M − 1). Nevertheless, the situation is not so obvious, because the χ 2 test needs n > 5 ( [Trumpler & Weaver 1953]; [Kendall & Stuart 1969]; [Press et al 1992]). In addition, some statistical text-books propose to use "quadratic" cells only ( [Diggle 1983], Chapt.…”
Section: The Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no commonly accepted confidence level in statistics, above which the null-hypothesis should already be rejected ( [Trumpler & Weaver 1953]; [Kendall & Stuart 1969]). It is only a general agreement that confidence levels smaller than 95% should not be considered.…”
Section: The Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that -at the begining -it is simply assumed that the Friedmannian model (either with Ω M > 1 or with with Ω M = 1 or with 0 < Ω M < 1) with zero cosmological constant is the correct model. Then it is asked that the observational data are in accordance with this model or not (for more details concerning this statistical approach see any standard text-book of Statistics (Trumpler & Weaver 1953;Kendall & Stuart 1976); from newer publications see, e.g., Feldman & Cousins (1998) and references therein).…”
Section: General Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Press et al (1992), Chapt.6.2) for ν = 58 degrees of freedom. Add here that fast approximate probability of the goodness-of-fit is obtainable also without the calculation of this function directly from the table of χ 2 distribution (see Trumpler & Weaver (1953), Table A5). One may use the fact that roughly for ν > 20 degrees of freedom the reduced χ 2 /ν distribution is practically not changing.…”
Section: The χ 2 Testmentioning
confidence: 99%