1990
DOI: 10.1109/8.55574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical assessment of evaporation duct propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(28), the exact gradient information depends on the solutions of the forward model (3) and the adjoint model (27). Making use of the solution to the forward model and the property of the Delta function integral, the adjoint model can also be solved by the split-step Fourier algorithm: (30) and…”
Section: Solution Of the Adjoint Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(28), the exact gradient information depends on the solutions of the forward model (3) and the adjoint model (27). Making use of the solution to the forward model and the property of the Delta function integral, the adjoint model can also be solved by the split-step Fourier algorithm: (30) and…”
Section: Solution Of the Adjoint Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second is a linear profile with M value of 330 M-unints at sea level. The third is a statistical result from the hydrometeorological data collected at East China Sea [29], which is constructed using the Log linear evaporation duct formula given by Hitney and Vieth [30] with an evaporation duct height of 9.1 m and the M value of 339 M-units at sea level. the forward model to calculate a modeled electric field, and then using the adjoint model to calculate a corrected refractivity profile.…”
Section: Influence Of the Initial Guess Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, an evaporation duct model should be selected. For thermally neutral conditions in which the air and sea temperature are equal, the modified refractivity M can be determined at any height z by the relationship [16] …”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaporation duct results from the rapid decrease of atmospheric moisture in the first few meters above sea level, which is quasipermanent present and can increase signals above diffraction levels significantly for near surface propagation at frequencies of 1 GHz and above [1][2][3]. The evaporation duct height (EDH) has been shown to be a good parameter to describe the profile of the modified refractivity versus height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%