2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amar.2020.100123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical and machine-learning methods for clearance time prediction of road incidents: A methodology review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exclusive use of quantitative methods (specifically statistical modelling) to analyze risk factors suffers from several weaknesses when applied to injury studies. A reliance on large sample sizes/populations to achieve adequate statistical power biases studies of smaller locales towards the null hypothesis, almost certainly leading to important patterns and risk factors being rejected due to inadequate statistical significance [6][7][8][9]. A traditional hypothesis testing (or otherwise p-value or confidence-interval-focused) approach additionally relies on assumptions of underlying distributions to assume multiple samples from a consistent population (a particularly perilous problem when using geospatial models), which, well suited to inferential modelling of highly-controlled experimental conditions [10], falls short of accounting for the non-parametric nature of models.…”
Section: Mixed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The exclusive use of quantitative methods (specifically statistical modelling) to analyze risk factors suffers from several weaknesses when applied to injury studies. A reliance on large sample sizes/populations to achieve adequate statistical power biases studies of smaller locales towards the null hypothesis, almost certainly leading to important patterns and risk factors being rejected due to inadequate statistical significance [6][7][8][9]. A traditional hypothesis testing (or otherwise p-value or confidence-interval-focused) approach additionally relies on assumptions of underlying distributions to assume multiple samples from a consistent population (a particularly perilous problem when using geospatial models), which, well suited to inferential modelling of highly-controlled experimental conditions [10], falls short of accounting for the non-parametric nature of models.…”
Section: Mixed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcohol Outlets: Pedestrian injury has been associated with proximity to alcohol-serving establishments, possibly due to increased risk of intoxication by either drivers or their victims [7,35,36]. Many studies have demonstrated that pedestrians who are intoxicated sustain injuries at a greater rate and severity than those who are not [23,31,37,38].…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Boosting is an approach for reducing bias. Outliers are highly tolerated, and the importance of explanatory variables can be evaluated in random forest models [28].…”
Section: Random Forest Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%