2017
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statins in systemic lupus erythematosus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects were achieved selectively via reduction of membrane lipids, raising the possibility that targeting membrane lipids could control immune cell activation and may be a novel therapeutic target for autoimmunity. There is also some emerging evidence that targeting dyslipidaemia with statins in SLE is associated with decreased risk of flares [51]. Various studies have trialed the use of statins in SLE with mixed outcomes; some showing beneficial outcomes [52][53][54][55], and some not meeting their target such as the Lupus Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (LAPS) [56] in adults with SLE and the Atherosclerosis Prevention in Paediatric Lupus Erythematosus (APPLE) trial [57] in JSLE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects were achieved selectively via reduction of membrane lipids, raising the possibility that targeting membrane lipids could control immune cell activation and may be a novel therapeutic target for autoimmunity. There is also some emerging evidence that targeting dyslipidaemia with statins in SLE is associated with decreased risk of flares [51]. Various studies have trialed the use of statins in SLE with mixed outcomes; some showing beneficial outcomes [52][53][54][55], and some not meeting their target such as the Lupus Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (LAPS) [56] in adults with SLE and the Atherosclerosis Prevention in Paediatric Lupus Erythematosus (APPLE) trial [57] in JSLE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Studies have compared the performance of SLICC criteria (sensitivity between 85% and 96.7%; specificity 76% and 83.6%) and ARC-EULAR (sensitivity between 87% and 96.3%; specificity 74% and 93.4%). [11][12][13] Both criteria performed worse in one of the studies, this, according to the authors, being due to a more selected population with several confounding factors. Thus, in more challenging situations, when classification criteria may be more useful, the performance can be sub-optimal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It was with great interest that we read the correspondence of Abud-Mendoza1 on our recent paper in which we described a decreased risk of developing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in statin users who continued their therapy for >1 year 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abud-Mendoza wondered whether inclusion of patients <40 years changed our findings 1. When we included these patients and excluded patients with SLE before the index date, we identified 539 431 statin users and 539 431 non-users after using a matched random sampling approach (1:1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation