Static or dynamic stretching program does not change the acute responses of neuromuscular and functional performance in healthy subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial

Barbosa, Germanna Medeiros; Dantas, Glauko André Figueirêdo; Silva, Bianca Rodrigues; Souza, Túlio Oliveira de; Vieira, Wouber Hérickson de Brito

doi:10.1016/j.rbce.2018.06.002

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Among 12 studies in which participants engaged in stretching exercises, three studies involved individual stretching exercises ( Barbosa et al, 2018 ; Beltrão et al, 2020 ; Melo et al, 2021 ), and seven involved stretching performed in group yoga classes ( Follador et al, 2019 ; Reed, 2014 ; Sullivan et al, 2019 ), tai-chi ( Chao et al, 2014 ; Follador et al, 2019 ), and guided stretching ( Edwards et al, 2018 ; Follador et al, 2019 ; McAuley, Jerome, Elavsky et al, 2003 ; McAuley, Jerome, Marquez et al, 2003 ). Two studies included mainly aerobic exercise ( Lee et al, 2021 ; Vandoni et al, 2016 ), in which we only analyzed those session moments when flexibility was assessed (i.e., pre-exercise, warm-up, and cooldown).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the stretching classes/exercises, investigators used distinct approaches and types of contraction (i.e., static, dynamic, passive, active): Follador et al (2019) used 16 static stretching exercises both in the upper and lower extremities; Melo et al (2021) included static passive stretching for hamstring muscles; Beltrão et al (2020) used static passive stretch exercise for the hamstrings; and Barbosa et al (2018) divided groups according to static or dynamic hamstring stretches. In other studies, the type of stretch was not described ( Edwards et al, 2018 ; Lee et al, 2021 ; McAuley, Jerome, Marquez et al, 2003 ; Vandoni et al, 2016 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This study was an 18-month follow-up of McAuley, Jerome, Marquez et al (2003) . Five studies were randomized controlled trials ( Barbosa et al, 2018 ; Beltrão et al, 2020 ; Edwards et al, 2018 ; McAuley, Jerome, Marquez et al, 2003 ; Melo et al, 2021 ), and six were quasi-experimental ( Chao et al, 2014 ; Follador et al, 2019 ; Lee et al, 2021 ; Reed, 2014 ; Sullivan et al, 2019 ; Vandoni et al, 2016 ). In studies using a control/comparison group, groups were either divided by exercise mode ( Barbosa et al, 2018 ; Edwards et al, 2018 ; Follador et al, 2019 ; McAuley, Jerome, Elavsky et al, 2003 ; McAuley, Jerome, Marquez et al, 2003 ) or exercise intensity ( Beltrão et al, 2020 ; Melo et al, 2021 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Assessing Affective Valence and Activation in Stretching Activities with the Feeling Scale and the Felt Arousal Scale: A Systematic Review

Henriques

Teixeira

2023

Percept Mot Skills

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Affective responses have been considered key determinants for exercise adherence, but research on affective responses to stretching activities is scarce. Given the role of these responses in exercise adherence, our aim in this review was to explore (a) the utility and feasibility of core affect in stretching-related activities as measured by the Feeling Scale (FS) and/or the Felt Arousal Scale (FAS); (b) the timing of administering these scales; and (c) the scales’ applicability and interpretability in this context. Inclusion criteria for studies in this review were experimental and non-experimental studies written in English that based affect assessment on the FS and/or FAS and that applied these scales to participants engaged in physical activity, individually or in groups. We also considered studies that focused on stretching activities that were either isolated or components of a class/activity and studies that used healthy participants of any age. Exclusion criteria were populations with mental health problems, cancer, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or diseases likely to alter pain perception or be associated with chronic pain, instrument validation studies, gray literature, and systematic reviews. We searched PubMed, SPORTDiscus and PsycINFO databases, and we added studies retrieved manually from reference sections while following PRISMA guidelines. We used the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool for judging methodological quality of research articles. Our final analyses were based on 12 empirical studies published between 2003 and 2021with a total of 718 participants. Both scales were found to be useful and feasible in the most usual places for exercise, but core affect results cannot be properly interpreted due to variability of study protocols and the absence of guidelines for adequate baseline assessment. Most studies recorded affect responses pre-session, during session, and post-session. We observed no standardized timing or frequency of assessment, and there was high heterogeneity among stretching protocols. Currently, research in core affect assessment of stretching-related activities lacks sufficient methodological quality to draw generalizable conclusions.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing Affective Valence and Activation in Stretching Activities with the Feeling Scale and the Felt Arousal Scale: A Systematic Review

Henriques

Teixeira

2023

Percept Mot Skills

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Em contrapartida, embora estudos tenham mostrado que os exercícios de alongamento aumentam a ADM, Barbosa et al (2018) demonstram que, independente do uso de técnicas estáticas ou dinâmicas, uma ou 10 sessões de alongamento estático não altera a ADM e o desempenho neuromuscular e funcional de indivíduos saudáveis. Contudo, vale ressaltar que o estudo supracitado, utilizou apenas 10 sessões de intervenção, ao contrário do presente estudo que realizou 48 sessões, podendo atribuir a melhoria na ADM verificada na nossa pesquisa ao maior período de intervenção.…”

Section: Tabelaunclassified

“…A eficiência dos diferentes métodos de alongamento é um fator que assume questionamentos quanto aos seus efeitos imediatos sobre a força, implicando em prejuízos sobre a mesma (Almeida et al, 2011;Endlich et al, 2009;Paulo et al, 2012;Ribeiro et al, 2016) ou não (Ayala, Croix, Baranda & Santoja, 2015;César, Silva & Rezende, 2018;Ferreira, Bertor, Carvalho & Bertonini, 2015) e, especialmente, sobre os efeitos crônicos, na qual estudos não apresentaram efeitos deletérios dos métodos supracitados sobre o desempenho neuromuscular (Barbosa, Dantas, Silva, Souza & Vieira, 2018;Konrad, Gad & Tilp, 2015;Minshull, Eston, Bailey, Rees & Gleeson, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Amplitude de movimento de militares submetidos a 12 semanas de alongamento com diferentes intensidades

Nogueira¹,

Sampaio²,

Silva³

et al. 2020

Educ. fís. cienc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivou-se investigar os efeitos de 12 semanas de treinamento da flexibilidade com diferentes intensidades na amplitude de movimento (ADM), para a flexão e extensão horizontal de ombro (FHO e EHO) e flexão da coluna lombar (FCL), em militares. Foram avaliados 90 alunos (17,02 ± 1,24 anos) e divididos aleatoriamente em três grupos, com 30 participantes cada: alongamento (GA), facilitação neuromuscular proprioceptiva (GFNP) e controle (GC). A amplitude articular foi verificada mediante a goniometria através do Protocolo LABIFIE e, para tal, utilizou o goniômetro de aço 360º “Lafayette Goniometer Set” – EUA, como instrumento de mensuração. Utilizou-se a Escala de Esforço Percebido na Flexibilidade – PERFLEX (0 – 110) para controlar a intensidade durante o GA (31- 60) por um período de 5 segundos, e GFNP (61 e 80) por 8 segundos de insistência para cada fase. Foram realizadas 3 séries com intervalo de cinco segundos entre as mesmas. A análise comparativa dos níveis de amplitude articular definida pela Análise de Variância (Anova one way) em combinação ao teste Post Hoc de Turkey, apontou diferenças apenas no GFNP: FHO (∆%=4,6; p=0,001); EHO (%∆=8,6; p=0,002); FCL, (∆%=56,1; p=0,001). Concluiu-se que o treinamento através da FNP alcançou maiores índices de desenvolvimento da ADM, quando comparado ao alongamento.

show abstract

Acute effects of stretching and/or warm-up on neuromuscular performance of volleyball athletes: a randomized cross-over clinical trial

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Static or dynamic stretching program does not change the acute responses of neuromuscular and functional performance in healthy subjects: a single-blind randomized controlled trial

Cited by 7 publications

References 46 publications

Assessing Affective Valence and Activation in Stretching Activities with the Feeling Scale and the Felt Arousal Scale: A Systematic Review

Assessing Affective Valence and Activation in Stretching Activities with the Feeling Scale and the Felt Arousal Scale: A Systematic Review

Amplitude de movimento de militares submetidos a 12 semanas de alongamento com diferentes intensidades

Acute effects of stretching and/or warm-up on neuromuscular performance of volleyball athletes: a randomized cross-over clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About