Static and Dynamic Properties of Various Baseballs

Abstract

In this study we investigated the compressive quasi-static mechanical properties and dynamic impact behavior of baseballs. Our purpose was to determine if static testing could be used to describe dynamic ball impact properties, and to compare static and dynamic properties between traditional and modified baseballs. Average stiffness and energy loss from 19 ball models were calculated from quasi-static compression data. Dynamic impact variables were determined from force–time profiles of balls impacted into a flat stationary target at velocities from 13.4 to 40.2 m/s. Peak force increased linearly with increasing ball model stiffness. Impulse of impact increased linearly with ball mass. Coefficient of restitution (COR) decreased with increasing velocity in all balls tested, although the rate of decrease varied among the different ball models. Neither quasi-static energy loss nor hysteresis was useful in predicting dynamic energy loss (COR2). The results between traditional and modified balls varied widely in both static and dynamic tests, which is related to the large differences in mass and stiffness between the two groups. These results indicate that static parameters can be useful in predicting some dynamic impact variables, potentially reducing the complexity of testing. However, some variables, such as ball COR, could not be predicted with the static tests performed in this study.

Ritualized fighting and biological armor: the impact mechanics of the mantis shrimp's telson

“…Indeed, the coefficient of restitution value is similar to that of a baseball striking an ash wall (i.e. a large plate composed of wood used to make baseball bats) (Hendee et al, 1998). Furthermore, although the abdominal segment's mechanical properties reveal little information about the size of the individual, the telson's coefficient of restitution, impulse and impact duration all scale with body size, suggesting that the telson might indeed convey size-based information during ritualized assessments.…”

“…-1 has a coefficient of restitution of 0.55 (Hendee et al, 1998), a golf ball hitting steel at 62ms -1 has a coefficient of restitution of 0.77 (Arakawa et al, 2009), a tennis ball hitting a racket at 8.3ms…”

Viscoelastic impact characterisation of solid sports balls used in the Irish sport of Hurling

“…Many of these methods have sought to represent dynamic impact conditions without the complexities and deficiencies of actual impact testing. Quasi-static compression has been the subject of many conflicting reports [8,11,18,20,21]. While being relatively easy to conduct, this method has questionable applicability to impact behaviour due to the difference in deformation (bilateral symmetrical compression in quasi-static compression compared to unilateral asymmetrical deformation in impact) and the substantially smaller deformation rates involved [19,22,23].…”

Optimization and Improvement of Throwing Performance in Baseball Pitching Machine Using Finite Element Analysis

“…4. This model shows the relationship between shear modulus G(t) and time t, which are given in the following equation (Hendee et al 1998, Nicholls et al, 2004, Sakai et al, 2008:…”