2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic field load testing of the long span Nissibi cable-stayed bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…xðt s þ iDtÞ (15) This CPD method shown in equations (11)- (14) can also be used for further decomposition of an IMF distorted by nonlinearities by assuming…”
Section: Conjugate-pair Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…xðt s þ iDtÞ (15) This CPD method shown in equations (11)- (14) can also be used for further decomposition of an IMF distorted by nonlinearities by assuming…”
Section: Conjugate-pair Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on preliminary results obtained by the authors in literatures, [2][3][4]15,22 we derive a conjugate-pair decomposition (CPD) method that can accurately track a signal's frequency by processing only three (or more) recent data points, and P-Box theory was employed to obtain the uncertain probability distribution of IF in this paper. In Instantaneous frequency analysis of tensioned cable section, the IF of Guanhe Bridge cable was calculated based on CPD method, to evaluate the accuracy of CPD, Hilbert-Huang transform (HHT) is used to extract the time-varying frequency of bridge cable, and the uncertain probability distribution of Guanhe Bridge cable was discussed, the P-box of IF also can be obtained, it will be useful to evaluate safety and potential fatigue problems in the cables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through [Correction added on 26 October 2020, after first online publication: An incorrectly duplicated surname in one of the authors' names was corrected after publication] analyzing the collected data, basic dynamic properties of studied structure can be identified, such as natural frequencies, damping ratios, and arbitrarily scaled modal shapes which are important indicators for evaluating dynamic performance of a bridge. [5][6][7][8] Natural frequencies are often used to assess structural global stiffness; if the measured fundamental frequency is smaller than theoretical value, actual stiffness of the bridge cannot meet the expectation, indicating some cracks or other-type structural damage (i.e., concrete spalling and exposed rebar). For identified modal shapes, they are widely utilized for locating the presence of structural damages; various modal shape-based damage indicators have been proposed, such as the difference of modal shape and modal shape curvature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following publication provide both guidelines for using load tests to evaluate bridges as well as provide numerous applications (Pinjarkar et al, 1990;Fu and Tang, 1992;Moses et al, 1994;Lichtenstein, 1995;Nowak and Saraf, 1996;Chajes et al, 1997Chajes et al, , 1999Chajes et al, , 2000Fu et al, 1997;NCHRP, 1998;The Institution of Civil Engineers, 1998;AASHTO, 2003;Chajes and Shenton, 2006;Schiff et al, 2006;Jeffrey et al, 2009;Hosteng and Phares, 2013;Olaszek et al, 2014;Peiris and Harik, 2016;Al-Khateeb et al, 2018). Most recently, Bayraktar et al (2017), has employed static and dynamic field testing on a cablestayed bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%