The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statement of EFSA on the scientific evaluation of two studies related to the safety of artificial sweeteners

Abstract: The European Food Safety Authority was asked to provide scientific advice on two studies, namely a carcinogenicity study in mice (Soffritti et al., 2010) and a prospective cohort study on the association between intakes of artificially sweetened soft drinks and preterm delivery (Halldorsson et al., 2010) and to conclude on the need to revise previous evaluations of aspartame or of the other sweeteners authorised in the European Union. The study by Soffritti et al. (2010) is a long‐term carcinogenicity study in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include work on the safety and regulation of low-calorie sweeteners in the United States [18], and analysis of the safety aspects of authorized sweeteners in the European Union by EFSA [19]. Open Journal of Applied Sciences This raises the need for regulation by health authorities and constant re-evaluation to ensure the safety of these food additives [20]. This presupposes good organization and detailed information on the presence and frequency of these substances in everyday consumer products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include work on the safety and regulation of low-calorie sweeteners in the United States [18], and analysis of the safety aspects of authorized sweeteners in the European Union by EFSA [19]. Open Journal of Applied Sciences This raises the need for regulation by health authorities and constant re-evaluation to ensure the safety of these food additives [20]. This presupposes good organization and detailed information on the presence and frequency of these substances in everyday consumer products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%