The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History After 1945 2018
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-349-95306-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-Sponsored History After 1945: An Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Clark (2018) demonstrates, past European rulers and regimes rooted their sovereign claims in a very specific codification of time—a regime-specific “historical signature” (Clark, 2018: 22). The consolidation of sovereign rule then required the production, management, and dissemination of historical knowledge, grounding state authority in “certain representations of the state” (Bevernage and Wouters, 2018: 4) in history. In modern Ethiopia too, idea of state sovereignty has been built on a specific account of the state’s history as a “teleological narrative” of the past structured around selective “periods, people and places” (Clapham, 2002: 41).…”
Section: Selective Ethiopian History and The “Great Tradition”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Clark (2018) demonstrates, past European rulers and regimes rooted their sovereign claims in a very specific codification of time—a regime-specific “historical signature” (Clark, 2018: 22). The consolidation of sovereign rule then required the production, management, and dissemination of historical knowledge, grounding state authority in “certain representations of the state” (Bevernage and Wouters, 2018: 4) in history. In modern Ethiopia too, idea of state sovereignty has been built on a specific account of the state’s history as a “teleological narrative” of the past structured around selective “periods, people and places” (Clapham, 2002: 41).…”
Section: Selective Ethiopian History and The “Great Tradition”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows us to see the emergent possibilities of experience, to conceptualize such places beyond the historical narratives that might frame them. It can begin to explain how such a room might engender experiences or events with a resonance that shimmers in time and space, that emerges and dissipates, that ‘punctuates the in-act, leading the event elsewhere than toward the governant fixity of the major’ (Manning, 2016: 7), the major in this case being the state-sponsored history (Bevernage and Wouters, 2018) represented at Camp des Milles. In Ben’s case, the ‘minor’ was part of a personal memory that made the experience of the space more intense and connected him, through his own past, to the experiences of others in the same space, at least as he imagined them.…”
Section: The Minor Gesture and Atmospheric Attunementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, this article critically engages with geographies of state commemoration, seeking a new way to understand how this particular form of state-sponsored history, or those forms of the past that are officially narrated, inscribed, memorialised and promulgated, are part of our lives. Such histories are the ‘processes and outcomes of direct and indirect state influence’ that, although complex and diverse, have a direct relationship to official versions of the past and their reinforcement by the state (Bevernage and Wouters, 2018: 1). In focusing on state-sponsored forms of war commemoration, this article does not consider vernacular, folk or informal sites or ceremonies, nor those to other types of national histories, even though these often stimulate intense affective and sensory responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%