Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.21608/iccae.2016.43759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the Art Review on Bridges Structural Health Monitoring (Model Testing)

Abstract: Most structural health monitoring methods focus on using dynamic responses to detect and locate damage (i.e. items I and II above) because they are global methods that can provide rapid inspection of large structural systems. These dynamic-based methods can be divided into four groups: (1) spatial-domain methods, (2) modal-domain methods, (3) time-domain methods, and (4) frequency-domain methods. Spatial-domain methods use changes of mass, damping, and stiffness matrices to detect and locate damage. Modal-doma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous valuable studies have been conducted to investigate the reasons and how SHM systems are used to monitor bridges, which have stated the reasons (Figure 1) [21][22][23][24][25]. In addition to receiving and collecting information from bridges, SHM is also capable of evaluating, analyzing, and predicting obtained data in order to determine appropriate actions for raising and enhancing the capacity and life-span of bridges.…”
Section: Structural Health Monitoring (Shm) System For Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous valuable studies have been conducted to investigate the reasons and how SHM systems are used to monitor bridges, which have stated the reasons (Figure 1) [21][22][23][24][25]. In addition to receiving and collecting information from bridges, SHM is also capable of evaluating, analyzing, and predicting obtained data in order to determine appropriate actions for raising and enhancing the capacity and life-span of bridges.…”
Section: Structural Health Monitoring (Shm) System For Bridgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to properly identify problems at a higher level in a hierarchical system, it is generally required to have some understanding of the lower levels. Each subsequent level's success may be affected by the prior levels' results in comparison to the one being completed [52][53][54]. Damage has been categorized in various novel ways by researchers [52,53] Level V (Damage prediction): After completing the previous four levels, this level assesses the bridge's remaining usable life or its viability status, depending on the situation.…”
Section: Defining and Identifying The Damagementioning
confidence: 99%