State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement

Guerrero, María Eugenia; Jacobs, Reinhilde; Loubele, Miet; Schutyser, Filip; Suetens, Paul; Steenberghe, Daniël van

doi:10.1007/s00784-005-0031-2

Cited by 311 publications

(228 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

207

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[24][25][26] DVT'nin BT'ye göre daha küçük kesit kalınlığı ile görüntülerin elde edilmesine olanak sağlaması, daha kısa sürede, gerçek boyutta ve yüksek çözünürlükte görüntüler elde edilmesi, 20,26 hastanın maruz kaldığı radyasyon miktarının da BT cihazlarından yaklaşık 15-20 kat daha az olması gibi önemli üstünlükleri olduğu bilinmektedir. 20,[27][28][29] 38 Sinüs radyografisinde kullanılan konvansiyonel radyografilerin; ideal hasta pozisyonunu sağlamada güçlük, diğer anatomik yapıların süper-pozisyonu ve yumuşak ve sert doku patolojilerinin tespitindeki zorluklar gibi dezavantajları vardır. 39 Maksillofasiyal bölgenin sert dokularını görüntülemek için tasarlanmış olan DVT, BT' ye göre daha düşük doz ve daha az maliyet avantajına sahiptir.…”

Section: Gereç Ve Yöntemunclassified

The Indications for Dental Volumetric Tomography in a Turkish Population Sample

Ertaş¹,

Kalabalık²

2015

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Gereç Ve Yöntemunclassified

The Indications for Dental Volumetric Tomography in a Turkish Population Sample

Ertaş¹,

Kalabalık²

2015

Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…29 Practitioners have begun using office-based CBCT scanners in preoperative imaging for implant procedures, capitalizing on availability and low dosing requirements. A review by Guerrero et al 30 outlines the clinical and technical aspects of CBCT, which have popularized this new technique. Preliminary evidence addresses the ability of CBCT images to characterize mandibular and alveolar bone morphology, as well as to visualize the maxillary sinuses, incisive canal, mandibular canal, and mental foramina, all structures particularly important in surgical planning for dental implantation.…”

Section: Implantologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 2: Clinical Applications

Miracle¹,

Mukherji²

2009

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

300

207

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARY: Conebeam x-ray CT (CBCT) is being increasingly used for point-of-service head and neck and dentomaxillofacial imaging. This technique provides relatively high isotropic spatial resolution of osseous structures with a reduced radiation dose compared with conventional CT scans. In this second installment in a 2-part review, the clinical applications in the dentomaxillofacial and head and neck regions will be explored, with particular emphasis on diagnostic imaging of the sinuses, temporal bone, and craniofacial structures. Several controversies surrounding the emergence of CBCT technology will also be addressed. C onebeam CT (CBCT) is an advancement in CT imagingthat has begun to emerge as a potentially low-dose crosssectional technique for visualizing bony structures in the head and neck. The physical principles, image quality parameters, and technical limitations relevant to CBCT imaging were discussed in Part 1 of this 2-part series. The second part presented here will highlight the evidence related to CBCT applications in head and neck as well as dentomaxillofacial imaging. Controversial aspects of this technology will also be addressed, including limitations in image quality and its often officebased operational model.CBCT was first adapted for potential clinical use in 1982 at the Mayo Clinic Biodynamics Research Laboratory. 1 Initial interest focused primarily on applications in angiography in which soft-tissue resolution could be sacrificed in favor of high temporal and spatial-resolving capabilities. Since that time, several CBCT systems have been developed for use both in the interventional suite and for general applications in CT angiography. 2,3 Exploration of CBCT technologies for use in radiation therapy guidance began in 1992, 4,5 followed by integration of the first CBCT imaging system into the gantry of a linear accelerator in 1999. 6 The first CBCT system became commercially available for dentomaxillofacial imaging in 2001 (NewTom QR DVT 9000; Quantitative Radiology, Verona, Italy). Comparatively low dosing requirements and a relatively compact design have also led to intense interest in surgical planning and intraoperative CBCT applications, particularly in the head and neck but also in spinal, thoracic, abdominal, and orthopedic procedures. [7][8][9][10][11] Diagnostic applications in CT mammography and head and neck imaging are also under evaluation. 12-14 The technical and clinical considerations pertaining to CBCT imaging in many of these applications have been the subjects of several recent reviews. [15][16][17][18][19] The recent review by Dörfler et al 16 of the neurointerventional applications of CBCT is of particular interest to the field of neuroradiology.The discussion below will focus on the diagnostic and treatment-planning applications of CBCT in dentomaxillofacial and head and neck imaging. Commercially available CBCT systems for dentomaxillofacial imaging include the CB MercuRay and CB Throne (Hitachi Medical, Kashiwi-shi, Chiba-ken, Japan), 3D Accuitomo products (J. Mor...

show abstract

“…6 More recently in 2001, CBCT systems was developed providing another three-dimensional alternative to conventional medical CT with several advantages like in CBCT volumes of data are captured with a single 360º rotation about the patient head; this is possible since the X-ray volumes used in CBCT gaplessely contact each other. CBCT has proven to capture structures with high contrast, have excellent image acquisition of such structures as the inferior alveolar nerve canal and has proven more reliable than medical CT. 7 In addition, CBCT provides the…”

Section: /Jp-journals-10011-1344mentioning

confidence: 99%

CBCT as an Emerging Gold Standard for Presurgical Planning in Implant Restorations

Shankar¹,

Pal²,

Rai³

et al. 2013

JIAOMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diagnostic radiology has undergone profound changes in the last three decades. New technologies have emerged and are being readily accepted into dentistry. Rapid developments in diagnostic devices and software applications have allowed new methods for dentomaxillofacial diagnosis and treatment planning as well as prosthetic and surgical treatment. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is one of the most important developments in dental radiology over the years. Contemporary implant dentistry is a primarily prosthetically driven treatment. Implant restorations as a treatment modality is on rise in day to day practice. The implant position is defined during the diagnostic phase, and the radiographic guide indicates accurately the area of concern on the CBCT. CBCT can be used as an alternative imaging modality to conventional medical spiral tomography, spiral multislice computed tomography for preoperative radiograph assessment of potential dental implant sites. CBCT is capable of providing submillimeter resolution in image of high diagnostic quality, reliable bone width, bone height and bone density measurements comparable to CT and less radiation exposure the CT. CBCT is promising alternative to conventional CT for successful presurgical planning in implant restorations.

show abstract

State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement

Cited by 311 publications

References 36 publications

The Indications for Dental Volumetric Tomography in a Turkish Population Sample

The Indications for Dental Volumetric Tomography in a Turkish Population Sample

Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 2: Clinical Applications

CBCT as an Emerging Gold Standard for Presurgical Planning in Implant Restorations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About