2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the art of aerobic granulation in continuous flow bioreactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
2
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The aerobic granulation is a self-immobilization process in which the loose biomass is converted into high-density compacted granule [1][2][3][4]. The aerobic granular sludge (AGS), compared to traditional activated sludge, has more excellent characteristics in terms of regular shape and compact structure, sedimentation, biomass accumulation, resistance to toxic compounds and high organic load, and removal efficiency of nutrient salts [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerobic granulation is a self-immobilization process in which the loose biomass is converted into high-density compacted granule [1][2][3][4]. The aerobic granular sludge (AGS), compared to traditional activated sludge, has more excellent characteristics in terms of regular shape and compact structure, sedimentation, biomass accumulation, resistance to toxic compounds and high organic load, and removal efficiency of nutrient salts [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of advanced biological nitrogen removal for mainstream wastewater treatment, efforts are merging from two research directions, that is, (a) employ anammox in mainstream to reduce 60% of energy and 100% of chemicals required in traditional biological nitrogen removal (Strous, Heijnen, Kuenen, & Jetten, 1998; Tomaszewski, Cema, & Ziembińska‐Buczyńska, 2017); and (b) employ aerobic granular sludge in mainstream for high‐rate bioreaction, bioprocess consolidation, and settleability enhancement (Kent, Bott, & Wang, 2018; Sun, Angelotti, & Wang, 2019). As a result, attempts have been made to immobilize critical microbial communities required for successful anammox in aerobic granules with the hope of future application in the continuous‐flow treatment trains of mainstream wastewater treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the slow‐growing nitrifying aerobic granules are noted for their outstanding structural stability (Liu, Yang, & Tay, 2004), almost all of the aerobic granules reported so far were cultivated in SBRs (He, Zhang, Zhang, & Wang, 2017; Wei et al, 2018), which is incompatible with the continuous‐flow nature of the mainstream wastewater treatment (Kent et al, 2018; Sun et al, 2019). Although some nitrifying granules have been studied in CFRs, the longest cultivation only lasted about 300–400 days (Bartrolí, Pérez, & Carrera, 2010; Isanta et al, 2015; Kent et al, 2018). Technically, aerobic granular sludge is amenable to SBRs but not to CFRs due to the challenges in implementing feast/famine conditions and selection pressure required for aerobic granulation in the latter (Kent et al, 2018; Sun et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy consumption is lower and the treatment performance is improved [45,46]. Up to now, the technology has only been developed as a batch process, and therefore process technology is under development to realize continuous treatment [47].…”
Section: Nereda ® Fast Settling Of Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%