In recent years, it has become a commonplace to argue that cities should be the focus point of sustainable development. Various authors have presented a variety of arguments why cities should be the preferred target to foster sustainable development-focused innovation;
-The average consumption of resources of urban dwellers is higher.
-The population of cities is growing continuously, while rural populations stabilize [1].
-Deteriorating living conditions and segregation in cities caused by processes of gentrification of traditional neighbourhoods that drive out lower income groups to the suburbs [2]. -Cities are 'concentrated' emitters of pollutants and therefore solutions and re-use might be easier to implement [3].On the other hand, authors have argued that the nature of the city, as being a centre of gravity of production and consumption, creates options for leaps in the resource and land use efficiency: As distances of transport are relatively short, options for a circular economy that could reduce resource consumption, emissions, and land use are much more within the reach of cities than they are for rural communities.Moreover, cities are centres of the young [4] and bright avant-garde, who generally are a driving force of change. The knowledge infrastructure, research institutions, universities, design and engineering agencies are virtually all located in cities [5,6]. So why have those circular urban economy options not yet been developed?The first factor that has to be mentioned is that the type of innovation required does not lead to a relatively simple development of optimisation: -It concerns co-optimisation of consumption of materials and scarce energy resources, waste/emission reduction, and the efficient use of space (for different purposes); a complex of interrelated issues, interests, and risks. -Change in the existing urban fabric is complex and expensive. New 'greenfield' urban areas have become rare in most parts of the world. For change of existing urban systems, there are only rare, and quite narrowly defined, windows of opportunity to implement major change. -The large-scale systems of the city have a monopolistic (or highly regulated market) character. In such systems, the incentives for innovation are weak, and might be suppressed by an organisational culture of autonomy [7]. -The future city requires not just new organisations and systems but also new behaviours of both citizens and organisations. That implies not just learning new behaviours, but also unlearning old behaviours. -Together, this creates such complexity that traditional planning will not be very successful. Socio-technical experiments [8], living labs [9,10] and niche experiments [11] might be means to both stimulate and analyse processes of change in the city.