Laboratory Shear Strength of Soil 1981
DOI: 10.1520/stp28744s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the Art: Laboratory Strength Testing of Soils

Abstract: A review and evaluation of the advantages and limitations of laboratory equipment for measuring the shear strength of soils are presented. Equipment evaluated include direct shear, torsional shear, simple shear, triaxial, multiaxial (true triaxial), plane strain, hollow cylinder triaxial, and directional shear devices. The evaluation indicates that the impetus to obtain parameters for constitutive equations and modeling has resulted in the development of improved equipment and testing techniques; specifically,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the shear box apparatus does not correctly simulate the actual field conditions under which the soil deforms, doubt is cast upon the reliability of test results to be used in practical engineering designs. Besides the specimen scale effects, other testing-related issues of the DSA include non-uniform stress and strain, and the associated progressive failure inside the specimen (Terzaghi & Peck, 1948;Hvorslev, 1960;Saada & Townsend, 1981). In addition, ambiguities exist in interpreting shear strength parameters owing to the fact that principal stress rotation occurs continuously until the peak state, and the failure plane may deviate from the horizontal mid-plane (Morgenstern & Tchalenko, 1967;Jewell & Wroth, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the shear box apparatus does not correctly simulate the actual field conditions under which the soil deforms, doubt is cast upon the reliability of test results to be used in practical engineering designs. Besides the specimen scale effects, other testing-related issues of the DSA include non-uniform stress and strain, and the associated progressive failure inside the specimen (Terzaghi & Peck, 1948;Hvorslev, 1960;Saada & Townsend, 1981). In addition, ambiguities exist in interpreting shear strength parameters owing to the fact that principal stress rotation occurs continuously until the peak state, and the failure plane may deviate from the horizontal mid-plane (Morgenstern & Tchalenko, 1967;Jewell & Wroth, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test specimen, which represents a single point under consideration in the ground, must be subject to a reasonably uniform state of effective stress for accurate interpretations of the experimental data. However, in common with other devices for the shear strength measurement, the HCTA has been criticized (for example Saada and Townsend 1981) on account of the level of stress nonuniformity that may develop. A new HCTA that facilitates stress path testing over a wide strain range has been developed recently by O'Kelly and Naughton (2003,2005) at University College Dublin (UCD) and, in a general context; the study of the stress nonuniformity associated with this apparatus is an important consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To justify this assumption, Lucks et al (1972) performed theoretical linear elastic analyses of the NGI type DSST, showing that 70z of the sample was uniformly stressed. However Saada and Townsend (1981) criticised some of the assumptions used in such analyses, particularly concerning the amount ofˆxity at the boundaries, and cite the results of Wright et al (1978) who used photo-elastic methods to illustrate a nonuniform specimen stress distribution. Nevertheless, results from tests conducted by Vucetic and Lacasse (1982) in the NGI apparatus on medium stiŠ clay at diŠerent height to diameter ratios have shown that the non-uniformities do not signiˆcantly aŠect the measured soil behaviour.…”
Section: Direct Simple Shear Test (Dsst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary criticisms applied to the direct shear test relate to the non-uniformity of stress and strain throughout the sample (Saada and Townsend, 1981). This occurs as a result of the rigid platens which are used to conˆne the specimen.…”
Section: Direct Shear Test (Dst)mentioning
confidence: 99%