2007
DOI: 10.3208/sandf.47.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study Between the NGI Direct Simple Shear Apparatus and the Mikasa Direct Shear Apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a comparison study performed by Hanzawa et al (2007) on Drammen and Ariake clays, it was found that the shearing properties measured by the direct shear apparatus are the same as those measured by the simple shear apparatus at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI). In this study, the size and preparation of the specimens are the same as the CRS apparatus, i.e., 60 mm, and with a height of 10 to 20 mm.…”
Section: Testing Apparatus and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a comparison study performed by Hanzawa et al (2007) on Drammen and Ariake clays, it was found that the shearing properties measured by the direct shear apparatus are the same as those measured by the simple shear apparatus at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI). In this study, the size and preparation of the specimens are the same as the CRS apparatus, i.e., 60 mm, and with a height of 10 to 20 mm.…”
Section: Testing Apparatus and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is generally accomplished by modifying the normal load during shearing either through an active control system (which adjusts the normal load on the specimen during shear in response to a measurement of specimen height -e.g., Taylor, 1952;O'Neil, 1962) or passive control system (which mechanically restrains the specimen height and measures changes in normal load with a load cell -Takada, 1993). Direct shear devices with these modifications have been shown to provide reasonable estimates of undrained strength from constant volume simple shear tests (e.g., Hanzawa et al, 2007). However, the emphasis of the present paper is on the relatively pragmatic question of whether an unmodified, conventional direct shear device can be operated to provide reasonable estimates of undrained strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1 Conditions of (a) direct simple shear and (b) direct shear box [2] Direct simple shear test is more accurate than direct shear test and triaxial test [1]. Simple shear is in cylindrical shape.…”
Section: Hemic Peatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct simple shear test is a new improvement of direct shear box. Both devices will be applied shear directly to the soil specimen, but the direct shear test has inhomogeneity of the resultant strains and applied stress compare to direct simple shear test that can minimize them [2]. The shearing condition of direct simple shear and direct shear box are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%