2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3576172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the Art in Electronic Dosemeters for Neutrons

Abstract: Articles you may be interested in 3D printer generated thorax phantom with mobile tumor for radiation dosimetry Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 074301 (2015); Abstract. The paper presents an overview of electronic personal dosemeters for neutrons in mixed neutron/photon fields. The energy response of commercially available electronic dosemeters in quasi-monoenergetic neutron fields and their performance in working places is discussed. The response curves are extended to high-energy neutrons up to 100 MeV, new prototype… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the SiC detectors did demonstrate the lowest neutron-gamma crosssensitivity ratio relative to Co-60 photons (E max [AmBe] / E max [Co-60]≈6.5), with D-PC providing the best ratio (16). This suggests that there could be more difficulty in discriminating gamma-ray interference from direct neutron detection in the SiC relative to the other detectors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the SiC detectors did demonstrate the lowest neutron-gamma crosssensitivity ratio relative to Co-60 photons (E max [AmBe] / E max [Co-60]≈6.5), with D-PC providing the best ratio (16). This suggests that there could be more difficulty in discriminating gamma-ray interference from direct neutron detection in the SiC relative to the other detectors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For most devices, neutron detection in electronic dosemeters is achieved by using Si detectors with several neutron conversion layers [14,15] to give a characteristic energy response, which for the most part is similar for the majority of devices on the market [16,17]. However, maintaining a flat dose equivalent response over such a wide range of energies (0.025 eV to 15 MeV) is extremely difficult, with the neutron personal dose equivalent relative response of these devices often ranging from ≈0.1 to 15 [16].…”
Section: Electronic Personal Neutron Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%