2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3031340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using LSTM and NARX Neural Networks

Abstract: Highly accurate state of charge (SOC) estimation of lithium-ion batteries is one of the key technologies of battery management systems in electric vehicles. The performance of SOC estimation directly influences the driving range and safety of these vehicles. Due to external disturbances, temperature variation and electromagnetic interference, accurate SOC estimation becomes difficult. To accurately estimate the SOC of lithium-ion batteries, this paper presents a novel machine-learning method to address the ris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among all DL architectures compared in the study, the proposed transformer model achieved the lowest RMSE of 1.1075%, 1.3139% and 1.1914% and MAE of 0.4441%, 0.5680% and 0.6502% on the test drive cycles outperforming even the recurrent models which has been widely used for SOC estimation as shown in Table 2 . We also note that the convolutional models such as the Resnet 40 and the Inception Time 51 also outperformed the conventional GRU 41 and LSTM 52 model. The baseline Transformer model that is not trained with the proposed training framework scores poorly along with the feedforward DNN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Among all DL architectures compared in the study, the proposed transformer model achieved the lowest RMSE of 1.1075%, 1.3139% and 1.1914% and MAE of 0.4441%, 0.5680% and 0.6502% on the test drive cycles outperforming even the recurrent models which has been widely used for SOC estimation as shown in Table 2 . We also note that the convolutional models such as the Resnet 40 and the Inception Time 51 also outperformed the conventional GRU 41 and LSTM 52 model. The baseline Transformer model that is not trained with the proposed training framework scores poorly along with the feedforward DNN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Among all DL architectures compared in the study, the proposed transformer model achieved the lowest RMSE of 1.1075%, 1.3139% and 1.1914% and MAE of 0.4441%, 0.5680% and 0.6502% on the test drive cycles outperforming even the recurrent models which has been widely used for SOC estimation as shown in Table 2. We also note that the convolutional models such as the Resnet 41 and the Inception Time 40 also outperformed the conventional GRU 42 and LSTM 43 model. The baseline Transformer model that is not trained with the proposed training framework scores poorly along with the feedforward DNN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The hyperparameters we need to consider here are the time step length T and the hidden state size m of the LSTM layer. For the proposed model, we set T as varying among [5,10,15] and m as varying among [16,32,64,128]. The average RMSE results for the 5-fold CV are tabulated in Table 3.…”
Section: Performance With Different Hyperparametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was implemented by [9], which used standard driving cycles (SDC) as input of the simulation model. The second method consists of predicting the SOC through Machine Learning (ML) techniques using the battery data collected while driving the electric vehicle [10]; for example, using information from the battery itself (voltage, current, temperature) and ML algorithms to predict the future SOC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%