2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2291-4_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-Feedback Stabilization of Stochastic Non-holonomic Systems (SNSs) Under Arbitrary Switchings with Time-Varying Delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…System (3) is more general than some existing systems such as (Du et al 2015a; Gao et al 2011; Wang and Wei, 2007; Wang and Zhu 2018; Zhang et al 2012) in which d ( t ) = 0 . It should be pointed out that in Qin and Min (2018), the time-delay terms of systems are required to satisfy d i δ , for a known positive constant δ , and in Wu et al (2019), the time-delay terms of systems are required to satisfy τ · ( t ) η < 1 . From both theoretical and practical points of view, it is too restrictive to require a system to satisfy such delay restriction. Without imposing any assumptions on the time-varying delay, this paper largely generalizes the results in recent works on stochastic nonholonomic systems with time delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…System (3) is more general than some existing systems such as (Du et al 2015a; Gao et al 2011; Wang and Wei, 2007; Wang and Zhu 2018; Zhang et al 2012) in which d ( t ) = 0 . It should be pointed out that in Qin and Min (2018), the time-delay terms of systems are required to satisfy d i δ , for a known positive constant δ , and in Wu et al (2019), the time-delay terms of systems are required to satisfy τ · ( t ) η < 1 . From both theoretical and practical points of view, it is too restrictive to require a system to satisfy such delay restriction. Without imposing any assumptions on the time-varying delay, this paper largely generalizes the results in recent works on stochastic nonholonomic systems with time delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They obtained the adaptive state-feedback controller at the expense of delay-dependent nonlinear diffusion terms and constrained time-delay assumption, that is, d i δ for a known positive constant δ . Wu et al (2019) investigated state-feedback stabilization of stochastic nonholonomic systems under arbitrary switching with time-varying delays. However, the time-delay terms of systems are required to satisfy τ · ( t ) η < 1 . From both theoretical and practical points of view, it is too restrictive to require a system to satisfy such delay restriction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the aforementioned contributions have not taken into account the effect of time delay on the systems. e research of time delay systems has been received widespread attentions [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. One reason is that the timedelay phenomenon frequently arises and is inevitable in many practical systems, such as chemical engineering systems, communication systems, and mechanical systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qin and Min [22] studied the adaptive stabilization problem for a class of stochastic nonholonomic systems with time delays. is work gave the adaptive statefeedback control at the expense of delay-dependent nonlinear diffusion terms and time-delay assumption, i.e., d i ≤ δ for a known positive constant δ. Wu et al [23] studied statefeedback stabilization of stochastic nonholonomic systems under arbitrary switchings with time-varying delays. But the time-delay terms of stochastic nonholonomic systems is required to satisfy _ d(t) ≤ η < 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%