State Changes During Resting-State (Magneto)encephalographic Studies: The Effect of Drowsiness on Spectral, Connectivity, and Network Analyses

Abstract

BackgroundA common problem in resting-state neuroimaging studies is that subjects become drowsy or fall asleep. Although this could drastically affect neurophysiological measurements, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG), its specific impact remains understudied. We aimed to systematically investigate how often drowsiness is present during resting-state MEG recordings, and how the state changes alter quantitative estimates of oscillatory activity, functional connectivity, and network topology.MethodsAbout 8-min MEG recordings of 19 healthy subjects, split into ~13-s epochs, were scored for the presence of eyes-open (EO), alert eyes-closed (A-EC), or drowsy eyes-closed (D-EC) states. After projection to source-space, results of spectral, functional connectivity, and network analyses in 6 canonical frequency bands were compared between these states on a global and regional levels. Functional connectivity was analyzed using the phase lag index (PLI) and corrected amplitude envelope correlation (AECc), and network topology was analyzed using the minimum spanning tree (MST).ResultsDrowsiness was present in >55% of all epochs that did not fulfill the AASM criteria for sleep. There were clear differences in spectral results between the states (A-EC vs. D-EC) and conditions (EO vs. A-EC). The influence of state and condition was far less pronounced for connectivity analyses, with only minimal differences between D-EC and EO in the AECc in the delta band. There were no effects of drowsiness on any of the MST measures.ConclusionsDrowsiness during eyes-closed resting-state MEG recordings is present in the majority of epochs, despite the instructions to stay awake. This has considerable influence on spectral properties, but much less so on functional connectivity and network topology. These findings are important for interpreting the results of EEG/MEG studies using spectral analyses in neurological disease, where recordings should be evaluated for the presence of drowsiness. For connectivity analyses or studies on network topology, this seems of far less importance.

Functional brain alterations in symptomatic dermographism patients—An exploratory magnetoencephalography study

“…to obtain stable results 21 . Only epochs without artefacts or signs of drowsiness 22 were selected, and these epochs were downsampled by a factor 4 and filtered in canonical EEG/MEG frequency bands (delta (0.5–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha1 (8–10 Hz), alpha2 (10–13 Hz), beta (13–30 Hz), and lower gamma (30–48 Hz)). For each epoch, the relative power in each band was computed, and subsequently averaged over epochs, as well as over subjects per group and condition.…”

Neurophysiological alterations in mice and humans carrying mutations in APP and PSEN1 genes

“…Ten epochs were visually selected by AN and/or dr. E.M.M. Strijbis (physician) [ 49 ] based on the absence of artifacts and drowsiness of the patient and used for further analyses. Data analysis was restricted to a total of 11 frontal, 5 parietal, and 1 hippocampal virtual electrode, all of the left hemisphere, to match the mouse LFP data (Supplementary Table 2 ).…”

Neurophysiological MEG markers of cognitive impairment and performance validity in multiple sclerosis

“…Regarding the spectral measures, five epochs that did not contain any indication of drowsiness 25 ( Supplementary Information ) were used out of the ten selected and downsampled by a factor of 4. For every ROI of each patient, the relative powers in the six frequency bands and the peak frequency (i.e.…”

“…21 Source-localized MEG data was then constructed using an atlas-based beamforming approach: 22 78 cortical and 12 deep gray-matter (DGM) regions of interest (ROIs) 23,24 of the automated anatomical labeling (AAL). For each patient, 10 non-overlapping, artifact-free epochs of 16384 samples (13.11 seconds) were selected by visual inspection and filtered into six classical frequency bands: delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha1 (8-10 Hz), alpha2 (10-13 Hz), beta (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), and gamma (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48).…”