2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1804.05950
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State-Augmentation Transformations for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How to apply the method to practical problems with stochastic rewards is the problem. In next section, we review the SAT [22] as an MDP homomorphism, which enables the variance formula in a Markov process with a stochastic reward.…”
Section: Variance Formula For Markov Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…How to apply the method to practical problems with stochastic rewards is the problem. In next section, we review the SAT [22] as an MDP homomorphism, which enables the variance formula in a Markov process with a stochastic reward.…”
Section: Variance Formula For Markov Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We restate the SAT as an MDP homomorphism. Comparing with the original SAT theorem [22], the homomorphism version of SAT is on a more abstract level. An MDP homomorphism is a formalism that captures an intuitive notion of specific equivalence between MDPs [30].…”
Section: Sat Homomorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A commonly used quantile-based risk measure is value at risk (VaR). For VaR estimation with the SAT, see [7].…”
Section: Arxiv:190705231v1 [Cslg] 9 Jul 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reward functions are usually stochastic in many practical problems. It has been shown that, when the objective is risk-sensitive, and the reward needs to be converted to a simple form, the SAT should be implemented instead of a reward simplification [7]. In this paper, we present the SAT in a homomorphism version, and thoroughly discuss its pros and cons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%