2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in Gauteng academic hospitals, South Africa

Abstract: HIV infection was an independent risk factor for MRSA infection. The selection of appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment is essential in patients with MRSA infections because of non-susceptibility to many other antimicrobial classes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
25
2
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(36 reference statements)
5
25
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…HIV-infected persons were more likely to have CA-MRSA than HA-MRSA. This association might be explained by overall increase in this group of incidence of S. aureus bacteraemia (1,20). In addition, fever at diagnosis was associated with HA-MRSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…HIV-infected persons were more likely to have CA-MRSA than HA-MRSA. This association might be explained by overall increase in this group of incidence of S. aureus bacteraemia (1,20). In addition, fever at diagnosis was associated with HA-MRSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For effective analysis of bacteremia, the collection of blood cultures should precede empirical treatment and modified based on antibiotic susceptibility and resistance pattern [8]. Bacteremia caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus results in greater mortality with an increased tendency of resistance to various antimicrobial agents when compared to Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) bacteremia [35].…”
Section: Antimicrobial Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] Whilst no previous studies conducted on S aureus prevalence in a TJA population in South Africa, an epidemiological study found that nosocomial incidence of MSSA and MRSA varied from 1.9 to 3.7 cases per 1000 admissions and 0.03 to 0.08 cases per 1000 admissions, respectively. [28] In the USA, several studies of patients for TJA report the incidence of S aureus colonization to range between 17.5%-25.1% for MSSA and 1.8%-5% for MRSA respectively. [29][30][31] concurrent skin infections and antibiotic treatment misuse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36][37] Amongst nosocomial S aureus infections in South Africa, the overall prevalence of HIV was found to be 32%, which subdivided into 42% and 27% for MRSA and MSSA cases respectively (p=0.106). [28] In a review of 404 HIV-infected outpatients from two separate centers in Botswana, the nasal colonization of S aureus and MRSA was 36.9% and 3.2% respectively. [37] In HIV-infected patients, those living with children and in high population-density areas were at significantly increased risk for S aureus colonization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%