2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2011.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards in transitions: Catalyzing infrastructure change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both users and other developers may modify or extend them while competing technologies and enterprises arise; consider the many similar, but incompatible devices and standards developed during the early days of railroads, electric power, or digital computers. Consequently, when a need arises to link heterogeneous systems into networks , devices, and/or social apparatuses known as gateways —for example, AC/DC power converters, software/hardware combinations such as Ethernet, and legal arrangements such as international trade law (Egyedi, 1996; Egyedi and Spirco, 2011)—must be created. The network phase signals not only the involvement of many more actors but also growing social commitments manifested in, for example, explicit standards, user habituation, and organizational routines.…”
Section: Digital Environments In Infrastructure and Platform Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both users and other developers may modify or extend them while competing technologies and enterprises arise; consider the many similar, but incompatible devices and standards developed during the early days of railroads, electric power, or digital computers. Consequently, when a need arises to link heterogeneous systems into networks , devices, and/or social apparatuses known as gateways —for example, AC/DC power converters, software/hardware combinations such as Ethernet, and legal arrangements such as international trade law (Egyedi, 1996; Egyedi and Spirco, 2011)—must be created. The network phase signals not only the involvement of many more actors but also growing social commitments manifested in, for example, explicit standards, user habituation, and organizational routines.…”
Section: Digital Environments In Infrastructure and Platform Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, any attempt to systemize diverse and locally-embedded processes is likely to encounter a widespread perception, especially in academia, that standards and innovation contradict and exclude each other. This reservation has been challenged by Egyedi and Spirico, who emphasize the role that standards can play as a starting point for change against the backdrop of materially and socio-institutionally entrenched or locked-in infrastructures [33], which precipitate any energy transition agenda. The traditional opposition to standardization has been systematically refuted by a comprehensive analysis of the impact of standardization and standards on innovation [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For firms, financial resources are also needed to effectively apply strategies, including marketing. Another aspect is the brand reputation and credibility that was created in earlier standardization processes, which can help with creating legitimacy [30,31]. Furthermore, when a firm has superior complementary assets, this can help to gain an advantage in the standardization process [27].…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Technological superiority' is one aspect and refers to all aspects of the standard that make it better compared to other standards. It can be increased by adapting the standard to changing user requirements [30]. Another aspect relating to technological characteristics is 'compatibility' with e.g., a previous generation (backwards compatibility).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%