Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2005
DOI: 10.1115/1.1861474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization of the Finite Element Analysis Data-Exchange in Aeronautics Concurrent Engineering

Abstract: The paper presents some research and a business case study carried out in a European project focused on Concurrent Engineering and the implementation of data exchange standards in the aeronautics industry. It deals with the use of the STEP AP209 standard dedicated to the exchange of finite element analysis data. Applied in the context of Concurrent Engineering within the extended enterprise, the STEP AP209 standard should enhance the communication, exchange, and sharing of product data between mechanical engin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Application Protocol 209 (AP209), created in 2001, improves design analysis and manufacturing productivity of composites and metallic structures. It provides a data model to share CAE data during the whole product lifecycle [22]. This standard involves a neutral file format to avoid interoperability problems between different systems and, thus, to drastically reduce analysis costs.…”
Section: Data Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Application Protocol 209 (AP209), created in 2001, improves design analysis and manufacturing productivity of composites and metallic structures. It provides a data model to share CAE data during the whole product lifecycle [22]. This standard involves a neutral file format to avoid interoperability problems between different systems and, thus, to drastically reduce analysis costs.…”
Section: Data Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there is a huge difference between the STEP standard itself and the way it is implemented in commercial CAD/FEA systems, if it is. Consequently, data transfer between various commercial CAD/FEA systems through STEP in a unique and universal format is not practically efficient, even if it can be used quite successfully for specific needs [5]. Beall [2] presents the three solutions mentioned above and illustrates them with specific examples.…”
Section: Link With Previous Work and Enhancementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, there is a huge difference between the STEP standard itself and the way it is implemented in commercial CAD/FEA systems, if it is. Consequently, data transfer between various commercial CAD/FEA systems through STEP in a unique and universal format is not practically efficient, even if it can be used quite successfully for specific needs [5].…”
Section: Link With Previous Work and Enhancementsmentioning
confidence: 99%