1951
DOI: 10.1021/ac60059a013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization of Microchemical Methods and Apparatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1951
1951
1961
1961

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patterns of the distributions are rather like those reported by Willits (10), and their asymmetry shows, as did his results, the tendency for a given chemical procedure to give biased results.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The patterns of the distributions are rather like those reported by Willits (10), and their asymmetry shows, as did his results, the tendency for a given chemical procedure to give biased results.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…Averages are not indicated in the results; they could have no meaning for the present preliminary results. Likewise tolerance ranges cannot be derived from the data statistically; these determinations are not compared with fixed standards, as are those described by Scribner (6) and by Willits (10). Rather they are like those that Bright described for steel (1); as he said, we cannot derive rigorous limits from them for the differences from "true content," As Wernimont stated, "The precision of a test method cannot be stated as a single number" (9).…”
Section: Errors In Rock Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objectives of various cooperative programs may differ a great deal. For example, Willits (21) and Wernimont (20) describe contrasting approaches that have widely different objectives. In one case reported by Willits, a number of laboratories made determinations on two types of samples representing two chemical species and two levels of the ingredient (element), using two basic procedures but with variations of their own choice (equivalent to many methods).…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%