2014
DOI: 10.5958/0976-4038.2014.00566.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization ofKharifOnion Cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, very close difference was observed in acid content. These results are in close conformity with the findings of (Singh et al, 2000, Crowther et al, 2002) Mahanthesh et al (2009, Patil et al (2012) and Tripathy et al (2014).…”
Section: Effect Of Different Dates Of Transplanting On Total Soluble ...supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Likewise, very close difference was observed in acid content. These results are in close conformity with the findings of (Singh et al, 2000, Crowther et al, 2002) Mahanthesh et al (2009, Patil et al (2012) and Tripathy et al (2014).…”
Section: Effect Of Different Dates Of Transplanting On Total Soluble ...supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Between both the sulphur sources tested, gromorsulphur resulted higher bulb yield over gypsum. This result was corroborates obtained by Singh (2008); Channagouda et al (2009); Tripathy et al (2013) in onion. The higher crop response with the application of gromorsulphur might be due to controlled release characteristics of micronized SO 4 2sulphur particles which makes it readily available for utilization by the crop.Poor crop response with gypsum might be due to availability of less SO 4 2for crop because of leaching loss in coarse textured soils.…”
Section: Bulb Yieldsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2). Similarly, the reports of Tripathy et al (2014) and Behera et al 2017 suggested that the different varieties may have different diameters and weight of bulbs in different locations [27,28]. (Fig.…”
Section: Diameter and Bulb Weightmentioning
confidence: 70%