2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-2109(00)00069-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard versus low-level anticoagulation combined to low-dose dipyridamole after mitral valve replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Failure to describe allocation concealment across all aforementioned studies has resulted in a high risk of selection bias throughout the literature. In some cases, the trials were non‐randomized, with clinicians permitted to determine the allocation of patients to dual therapy or anticoagulant monotherapy 39,43 …”
Section: Antithrombotic Therapies In Mechanical Valve Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Failure to describe allocation concealment across all aforementioned studies has resulted in a high risk of selection bias throughout the literature. In some cases, the trials were non‐randomized, with clinicians permitted to determine the allocation of patients to dual therapy or anticoagulant monotherapy 39,43 …”
Section: Antithrombotic Therapies In Mechanical Valve Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the trials were non-randomized, with clinicians permitted to determine the allocation of patients to dual therapy or anticoagulant monotherapy. 39,43 In addition, most studies used relatively small sample sizes, commonly with under 200 patients per treatment arm, making the implication of any findings difficult to establish. In particular, similar rates of hemorrhage with and without aspirin in some trials may reflect the research being underpowered to find differences, leading to an underestimation of the risks associated with dual therapy.…”
Section: Through Open Access T a B L E 1 Summary Of Guidelines For Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Monthly checks of prothrombin were recommended, and asymptomatic patients with a too-low or a too-high INR (< 1.3 or > 5) were briefly hospitalized for INR control. 43 Hirsh and Fuster 44 have recommended a lower intensity of anticoagulation to a target INR of 2.5-3.5 for patients with mechanical prostheses. Different brain-to-core temperatures have been shown with different anaesthetics during CPB.…”
Section: Strategies Of Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%