BACKGROUND: Previous reports have shown that there are long waiting times to commence therapy in the community-based mental health programme, IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore both causes and potential solutions to alleviate the burden of these waits. METHODS: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Semi-Structured Interviews (SSIs) were conducted to identify causes and effects of these waits. Consequently, meaningful recommendations were made and tested with the aim of improving IAPT’s waiting times. RESULTS: SLR and SSIs revealed high ‘Did Not Attend’ (DNA) rates and a lack of support between initial appointments as being both a cause and effect of long waits. The identified issues were tackled with the development of an App design. Expert interviews and a mass survey fuelled the iterative process leading to a final prototype. Notable features included: therapist profile page, smart appointment reminders and patient timeline. Positive feedback was received from university students and ICS Digital, with scope to trial the App within Manchester CCG. CONCLUSIONS: In the long run, the App aims to indirectly shorten waiting times by addressing treatment expectations and serving as an IAPT companion along the patient journey, thus reducing anxiety and consequently DNAs.
Background: The choice of antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulants or antiplatelets, after prosthetic heart valve replacement or repair, remains a disputed topic in the literature. Antithrombotic therapies are used after heart valve intervention to reduce the rates of thromboembolic events, therefore improving patient outcomes. Different interventions may require different therapeutic regimens to achieve the most efficacious clinical outcome for patients. Methods and Discussion: This review aims to summarize and critique the available literature concerning therapeutic agents used for bioprosthetic and mechanical valves as well as for valve repair, so as to assist clinicians and researchers in making decisions with regard to their patients and research endeavors.
Aim A recent change to electronic fluid prescribing has enabled us to evaluate our adherence to recommendations. NICE clinical guideline 174 states that patients should receive 25-30ml/kg/day water and 1mmol/kg/day of sodium, potassium, and chloride with regards to maintenance fluid therapy. We retrospectively audited our practice in surgical patients. Method Patients were selected from two surgical inpatient wards in a district general hospital utilising random sampling over a one-month period. Prescribed intravenous fluid (IV) therapy over a 24-hour period was collected; in addition to weight, presence of an acute kidney injury (AKI) and indication for IV replacement (maintenance versus resuscitation). Results 50 patients were identified during the period. All of them were emergency presentations. Maintenance fluids were prescribed for 76% of patients. No patients had an AKI at time of data collection. The mean weight was 75kg. Overall, patients received a mean fluid volume of 2.3L/day. The mean concentration of electrolytes administered over a 24-hour period were: Sodium 297mmol, Potassium 13mmol, Chloride 237mmol. When adjusting for patient weight, this resulted in a net administration of: Sodium +221mmol, Potassium -62mmol, Chloride +162mmol. Conclusions Three quarters of surgical patients were administered maintenance fluids. The electrolyte contents of these fluids were inadequate. Patients received 295% excess Sodium, 216% excess Chloride, and 82% less than the recommended daily requirement of Potassium. We aim to introduce a protocol for maintenance fluid prescribing, in addition to teaching sessions, that would allow for adherence to guidelines and improve patient care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.