2009
DOI: 10.1021/ct8002354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard Free Energy of Binding from a One-Dimensional Potential of Mean Force

Abstract: A practical approach that enables one to calculate the standard free energy of binding from a one-dimensional potential of mean force (PMF) is proposed. Umbrella sampling and the weighted histogram analysis method are used to generate a PMF along the reaction coordinate of binding. At each point, a restraint is applied orthogonal to the reaction coordinate to make possible the determination of the volume sampled by the ligand. The free energy of binding from an arbitrary unbound volume to the restrained bound … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
285
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(122 reference statements)
7
285
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1A) (24). The protein was modeled using the AMBER 99SB force field (34) and the ligand with the general amber force field (GAFF) force field (35) as described by Doudou et al (22). The complex was rotated to align the vector defined by the C7 atom of benzamidine and the Cγ atom of ASP 189 to the z axis of the box.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1A) (24). The protein was modeled using the AMBER 99SB force field (34) and the ligand with the general amber force field (GAFF) force field (35) as described by Doudou et al (22). The complex was rotated to align the vector defined by the C7 atom of benzamidine and the Cγ atom of ASP 189 to the z axis of the box.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous computational studies on trypsin date back to the 1980s with work by Warshel et al (17) on binding free energies computed from potentials of mean force for trypsin and subtilisin. More recent efforts on the trypsinbenzamidine system, in particular, include studies of the conformational variability of the bound complex (18,19) and benzamidinium-derivatives binding affinity calculations via end-point methods (20,21) and via potential of mean force free-energy biased methods such as umbrella sampling (22) and metadynamics (23). In this work, we report 187 events of binding from bulk to bound based on free diffusion simulations, a quantitative analysis of the process of binding, and the identification of the rate-limiting step in the pathway of binding, which consists of a set of transient hydrogen-bond interactions on the surface of trypsin close to the binding pocket.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the standard free energy of binding ⌬G 0 , the free energy ⌬G V for changing from the standard-state volume V 0 ϭ 1661 Å 3 , which corresponds to a 1 M concentration, to the sampled unbound volume and the free energy ⌬G R to remove the restraints have to be included (38,39). The ⌬G 0 of binding can then be calculated as shown in Equation 3,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard free energy of binding, ⌬G o , is related to Kd via K d ϭ V 0 exp(Ϫ⌬G o /RT), where V 0 ϭ 1.661 nm 3 is the standard volume corresponding to a standard concentration of 1 M. ⌬G o was computed from the 1D PMF, W(z), using the method of Doudou et al (34) under the assumption that confinement of the three sampled ions in the bulk region is provided by the simulation cell (for details, see SI Methods).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%