“…The tree species composition from the present study showed a greater similarity to the North-Patagonian forests of the Taitao Peninsula (JI = 0.538) and the North-Patagonian forest studied by Gutierrez et al [13] (JI = 0.529) as compared with the forests of central and northern Chiloé (JI mean = 0.293). [18], Chiloé_N2 = North-Patagonian forest of Gutiérrez et al [13], and Group 2: Chiloé_C = Armesto and Fuentes [17], Chiloe_C2 = Donoso et al [9], Chiloé_C3 = Veblen [16], Chiloé_ARC = Armesto and Figueroa [10], Chiloé_N1 = Valdivian forest of Gutiérrez et al [13], Chiloé_NW = Donoso et al [8]. Note: Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between each forest group, n = number of plots; * Understory woody species.…”