2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stand scale effects of partial harvesting and clearcutting on small mammals and forest structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
63
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the years after clear-cutting, deer food such as the stems of shrubs, herbs and grasses, increase in abundance and availability (Harlow et al, 1997). Overstorey reduction results in increased; succulent (shrub) browsing by moose (Monthey, 1984), winter browsing (seedlings or saplings) by hare (Harlow et al, 1997), and tree seeds and invertebrate prey for small mammals (Fuller et al, 2004). Similarly Hylobius abietis populations are dependent on the abundance of fresh conifer stumps (Långström and Day, 2002).…”
Section: Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the years after clear-cutting, deer food such as the stems of shrubs, herbs and grasses, increase in abundance and availability (Harlow et al, 1997). Overstorey reduction results in increased; succulent (shrub) browsing by moose (Monthey, 1984), winter browsing (seedlings or saplings) by hare (Harlow et al, 1997), and tree seeds and invertebrate prey for small mammals (Fuller et al, 2004). Similarly Hylobius abietis populations are dependent on the abundance of fresh conifer stumps (Långström and Day, 2002).…”
Section: Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to tracking species composition, tree growth, and dead wood response to CT, we evaluated response of four selected groups of taxa for the following reasons: (i) forest floor vascular plants can be sensitive to anthropogenic disturbance, often showing increased diversity after a disturbance takes place (Paillet et al 2010) and some species require coarse woody debris (CWD) as substrate (Simard et al 1998); (ii) saproxylic invertebrates are associated with dead and dying wood (Speight 1989), and have been shown to decline in richness in response to thinning in naturally regenerated forest (Klimaszewski et al 2003) and with practices that reduce deadwood, but we suspected that they may benefit from coarse and fine woody debris (FWD) produced by CT due to the paucity of this resource in plantations; (iii) small mammals have lower abundance in intensive spruce plantations than in naturally regenerated softwood (Bowman et al 2001a, Fuller et al 2004, Keppie et al 2005, and large contiguous patches of plantations have been characterized with reduced small mammal abundance (Bowman et al 2001a);and (iv) forest birds are tightly linked to stand structure and deadwood, with up to 40% of North American forest birds using cavities for nesting (McComb and Lindenmayer 1999), and many of those species depend on deadwood as a source of food (e.g., Bütler et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deer Mice were also influenced by the silvicultural treatments: individuals were more abundant in sites harvested by CPRS and CPPTM than in the other sites . The Deer Mouse is an early successional species that generally benefits from low levels of retention (Steventon et al 1998, Fuller et al 2004. Snowshoe Hares displayed a similarly strong reaction to the differences in logging intensity among silvicultural treatments.…”
Section: Partial Cutting Old-growth Stands and Animal Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%