2016
DOI: 10.1177/1971400916665388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stand-alone coil embolization of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: Efficacy and technical issues

Abstract: Although the efficacy of coil embolization of anterior communicating artery aneurysms is unquestionable and the procedure-related complications are acceptable, they should not be neglected. Further investigations are needed to better understand protective factors, as well as to establish unequivocally appropriate management strategy of these complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other manuscripts, on the other hand, reported intraprocedural rupture of aneurysm as the dominating one. The incidence of this complication was frequently linked with overpacking of the aneurysm [14, 30], which is in accordance with our results. Generally, the most common reasons for the intraprocedural rupture mentioned in the literature are: coil oversizing, aneurysm overpacking, excessively stiff coils or incautious manoeuvres of the microcatheter or even the guidewire itself [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Other manuscripts, on the other hand, reported intraprocedural rupture of aneurysm as the dominating one. The incidence of this complication was frequently linked with overpacking of the aneurysm [14, 30], which is in accordance with our results. Generally, the most common reasons for the intraprocedural rupture mentioned in the literature are: coil oversizing, aneurysm overpacking, excessively stiff coils or incautious manoeuvres of the microcatheter or even the guidewire itself [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…[31]. Moreover, the mortality rate in our study (25.7%) seems to be relatively high, as in the majority of studies it ranges between 1% and 6.5% [14, 16, 19, 21, 22]. On the other hand, it is worth noting that the lion’s share of deaths during the hospitalization were linked with high Hunt-Hess grade at admission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 41%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7 The risk associated with treatment of intracranial aneurysms in general is less than 0.5% mortality and less than 5% morbidity but rises to 22% mortality and 32% morbidity in high-risk groups. 8,[11][12][13] This risk is to be weighed against the risk associated with the potential rupture of the aneurysm. Often, the difference regarding risks associated with different options are small.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%