2001
DOI: 10.1080/02660830.2001.11661455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stalling the learning process: Group dynamics in cyberspace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in contrast to earlier observations that high affiliation students interact more than those with low affiliation (Klein & Schnackenberg, 2000) and that social orientation is associated with communication in groups (Hall et al, 1988). One explanation for this discrepancy may be found in previous research indicating that shy students are more likely to express themselves in computer-mediated communication, compared to face-to-face situations (Davis & Ralph, 2001;Mabrito, 1991;Mason, 1989). Another explanation is that the use of median split in the current study did not adequately differentiate between high and low affiliation motives.…”
Section: Participant Interactionscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…This finding is in contrast to earlier observations that high affiliation students interact more than those with low affiliation (Klein & Schnackenberg, 2000) and that social orientation is associated with communication in groups (Hall et al, 1988). One explanation for this discrepancy may be found in previous research indicating that shy students are more likely to express themselves in computer-mediated communication, compared to face-to-face situations (Davis & Ralph, 2001;Mabrito, 1991;Mason, 1989). Another explanation is that the use of median split in the current study did not adequately differentiate between high and low affiliation motives.…”
Section: Participant Interactionscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Based on the literature on teams and student learning, we included the background variables of age, sex, time in the program, team size, and GPA as covariates in our analyses. Lawther and Walker (2001) report that age or maturity may be linked with Web-based student performance, whereas a number of researchers, including Arbaugh (2000aArbaugh ( , 2000c and Davis and Ralph (2001), find gender differences in participation; gender differences also have been reported in learning performance and satisfaction (Stelzer, 2001). Arbaugh (2002) and Arbaugh and Duray (2002) report that prior experience with online courses affects outcomes, and the team literature discusses the potential negative effect of team size on performance and satisfaction (Carron & Spink, 1995).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports many of the ideas presented in the introduction. The fact that blog participation was assessed, for instance, was seen as a necessary catalyst for encouraging this activity and for avoiding issues of non participation that Davis and Ralph (2001) noticed earlier. In this case blogging was encouraged but not taken over by the assessment structure.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…interface, reveal typically disappointing results. (see, for example, Baker & Lund, 1997;Davis & Ralph, 2001;Salmon, 2000;Vincent, 2000). Salmon cites technical, learning and moderating issues related to conferencing technology, with induction and training taking too much time, despite much reported enthusiasm (2000, p. 498-9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%