1995
DOI: 10.2307/2501740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stalin, Grain Stocks and the Famine of 1932-1933

Abstract: Most western and all Soviet studies of the Stalinist economy have ignored the role played by the stockpiling of grain in the agricultural crisis of the early 1930s. Thus in his major work on Stalinist agriculture published in 1949, Naum Jasny frankly admitted that data were insufficient to reach a conclusion, merely noting that “stocks from former years probably declined during 1932.” Baykov, Dobb, Volin and Nove said nothing about grain stocks. At the time, western commentators did pay some attention to the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tauger (1991), Davies, Tauger, and Wheatcroft (1995), Wheatcroft and Davies (2002), and Davies and Wheatcroft (2004) have now reviewed the archives on the immediate aftermath of collectivization, including the famine of 1932-33. The collective farms enabled Moscow to replace local decision making with its own detailed plans, instructions, and formal, but often transient rules.…”
Section: Collectivizing Peasantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tauger (1991), Davies, Tauger, and Wheatcroft (1995), Wheatcroft and Davies (2002), and Davies and Wheatcroft (2004) have now reviewed the archives on the immediate aftermath of collectivization, including the famine of 1932-33. The collective farms enabled Moscow to replace local decision making with its own detailed plans, instructions, and formal, but often transient rules.…”
Section: Collectivizing Peasantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 They argue that the Soviet government controlled only 1.5 million tons of grain reserves, not 4.5 million as Conquest assumed. 68 Furthermore, Tauger has shown that the harvest of 1932 was much worse than the statistics given in the Soviet sources. 69 With the available grain, the Soviet government could have saved thousands of people but not prevented the famine as such.…”
Section: The Exclusion Of Suffering: Chinese and Soviet Historiographmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the detailed consequences of collectivization and the mass deportation or detention of peasants who were excluded or resisted were concealed behind a thick veil of secrecy. Tauger (1991), Davies, Tauger, and Wheatcroft (1995), Wheatcroft and Davies (2002), and Davies and Wheatcroft (2003) have now reviewed the archives on the immediate aftermath of collectivization, including the famine of 1932-33. The collective farms enabled Moscow to replace local decision making with its own detailed plans, instructions, and rules.…”
Section: Collectivizing Peasantsmentioning
confidence: 99%