2010
DOI: 10.5465/19416520.2010.495581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder Theory:The State of the Art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
363
0
28

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,139 publications
(487 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
3
363
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…A prima facie, it appears to be in line with stakeholder theory (e.g., Parmar et al 2010;Wicks and Freeman 1998). However, stakeholder theory still basically is stakeholder capitalism; in fact it is a particular libertarian form of capitalism, championing personal freedom, individual property rights and a minimal state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A prima facie, it appears to be in line with stakeholder theory (e.g., Parmar et al 2010;Wicks and Freeman 1998). However, stakeholder theory still basically is stakeholder capitalism; in fact it is a particular libertarian form of capitalism, championing personal freedom, individual property rights and a minimal state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Some scholars, in particular those involved in Critical management studies, fear that Pragmatism may enhance already existing positivist and managerialist tendencies in current business ethics, intent on prescribing rules, codes and guidelines for managerial conduct that, however, do not touch on the nature of the capitalist production system, with its emphases on profit, efficiency and productivity (e.g., Painter-Morland and Ten Bos 2016;Parker 2003;Stokes 2011;Wray-Bliss 2009). Other scholars see more emancipatory potential in Pragmatism, arguing that it complements and supports stakeholder theory, in which managers and firms are exhorted to look beyond narrow shareholder interests to include environmental concerns and the interests of employees, clients and the communityat-large (e.g., Jacobs 2004;Parmar et al 2010;Wicks and Freeman 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ces deux théories bien qu'elles présentent des similitudes au niveau conceptuel 4 , les plaidoyers de la théorie institutionnelle l'ont ignorées ce qui constitue une opportunité pour mener davantage d'études dans ce sens (Parmar et al, 2010).…”
Section: La Gouvernance Et La Responsabilité Socialeunclassified
“…Elle contribue à la diffusion d'une culture de transparence rejoignant ainsi les principes de la gouvernance. Toutefois, la théorie des parties prenantes bien qu'elle apparaisse comme une théorie de la firme proposant une vision alternative de la gouvernance, elle se focalise sur les actionnaires considérés comme les parties prenantes les plus importantes (Campbell, 2006) tout en ignorant la nature des liens entre l'entreprise et son environnement (Parmar et al, 2010). Dans ce cadre, cette théo-rie suppose que les parties prenantes ont des préférences homogènes ce qui ne permet pas d'appréhender facilement la dynamique du processus de construction sociale et cognitive par lequel les intérêts d'une partie prenante sont pris en compte (Wolfe et Putler, 2002;Fassin, 2008Fassin, et 2009 5 .…”
Section: La Gouvernance Et La Responsabilité Socialeunclassified
“…The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries www.ejisdc.org theory sees the answers to these problems coming from an analysis of the relationships between a business and its stakeholders, how they cooperate to generate and trade value and how it transforms as time goes on (Parmar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework -Stakeholder Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%